My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 01/27/88
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1988
>
PC 01/27/88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 11:25:22 AM
Creation date
4/13/2007 2:01:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/27/1988
DOCUMENT NAME
PC012788
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
He stated tisat a full engineering study will be done regarding <br />Foothill p;d. He addressed the issue of the i-bBCt iroterchange, <br />seating that he felt the alternative of Zeaving the interchange <br />an its present locations and configurations witt-~ extra left turn <br />l apes on E~ernal and the o!i-raiTip woup d be feasible and can <br />possibly he paid for out of tt-se protect. He requested the <br />Co6i,lli ssi oners corisi der' this alternative. The other al t>=rnati ve <br />it to move the irsterchange, but at this ti:rie (rends are not <br />avai 1ablr3. <br />Charrinan Lindsey inquired about noise mitigaticans on the back <br />yards faC3!'lC~ Foothill Rd. t~ir. >~olph said that to preserve the <br />rural ttc:~osphere it was decided against soundwalls and to try to <br />face leisuses toward the road. They are Look:irsg toward an <br />adc:litional I5 feet in setbac~:s from the r©ad plus a ~E~ feet <br />landscape easement. In addition, the lots are Lc7,C~uv sq. ft. <br />Commissioner I`'licheiotti asked if the houses on Foothill would <br />all Ise similar. h1r. Fiol pl-i said they would be designed to vary. <br />i"Ir . ~:ol ph requested approval of the application. Chair ~Tsan <br />Lindsey responded tl'sat all avenues must be further explored <br />before apps oval . <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Tom Etlinn, ~`,?B Gloria Ct, stated that he spore at the previous <br />public hearing regarding this project. He thought the density <br />was still too high. He was in favor- of the concept of the <br />Golden Eagle Farms project recently approved. He was greatly <br />concerned about the iirspact on the school system along with <br />traffic impact on Foothill, adjacent areas and on and off <br />freeway traffic. <br />Chr-i s Woods, 78I sS Foothi. I t s }=::nol 1 I)r ve, represented Fouthi i l <br />k::noll Horrseowners Assns. He stated that they have been wor4:ing <br />with the developer. His concerns had to do with: impact on <br />schools, the final EIR, and traffic on Foothill Rd. He felt <br />that if Foothill ~d. were straightened it would create an island <br />and hence, a bazar d for chi 1 dren . He was i n favor of wal r:ways <br />aI ong Foothi I I F:d. and i n the i"iui rwood area with safety for <br />c!-sildren being a major- concern; further development of a <br />neighborhood park to include soccer, softball, tennis and <br />basketball. He sl.apported a buffer to protect wildlife; 165 <br />I-somes on Larsd A and 6~ hs7s~tes on Land Int. He said the Homeowners <br />F;ssri. would be happy to provide almost any I::i nd of crash bar-ri er <br />fcsr~ amen-gency access. <br />Sandra i}ibus, 79~= Eaccoon Hallow Ct. stated that she <br />appreciated the care taken in doing tl~ie studies. Here concerns <br />were that the rural atmosphere would be destroyed; that any <br />straightening of Foothill nd. would invite more speeding; and <br />the impact ors the schools, noting that no funding f r`os7! the State <br />seerrss certain. <br />F`age Fl <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.