Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner l~1i chef ott i agreed w ti-i these points, but f eI t Area <br />D density st-~ould be dropped from ii•=: to i~~~.}. Si-:efelt it was <br />important tc; receive sorf~e answers from tree school district; si-~e <br />felt more study should be devoted to the Foothill Rd. issue. <br />Commissi~rier Tarver° stated he did not totally agree regarding <br />the discussion of the school i ssueq t'~e was i n favor of houses <br />facir;c~ Foothill F:d.; he was comfortable with density of Area :`~, <br />but was ni~~t completely sure about Area S because of the <br />pr-o ~ i mi ty to the freeway. {-ie felt an i ndepth analysis of <br />Foott-=i l i Fid. fBernal should be done; he thought ti-~e nei gl-~borhood <br />pars; was nice with the planned trails, but was concerned t~aith <br />freeway noise. <br />Chai r~-nar~ ~i ndsey suggested t~'iat the devei open try to bring some <br />other design bac~~ regarding Area B. <br />Corrimi ssi oner Tar-}ler also felt that i ntra-structure s~-ivul d be <br />l oo~ied into more f ul 1 y as done with F'r-esl ey Homes. <br />_R_UD_--8~i- i 5-~D <br />Referral back -for report approval o-f f}UD-8f]-iJ-JD, application <br />of Tioga Construction Company to rezone an approximately x.63 <br />acre site to FjUD tf'lanned Unit Development} Commercial District <br />to accommodate automobile wash, service station, food mart, <br />restaurant and retail uses as permitted uses, and to approve a <br />development plan for an approximately 30,14 sq. ft. mixed use <br />commercial complex located at the southeast corner of Santa Rita <br />Road and Rimlico Drive. <br />Application continued to February i(i. <br />MATTERS FDR COMMISSION`S REVIEW <br />------------------------------- <br />A. Actions of the Council at their meeting of 1I19f~8 <br />There was no action required on this item. <br />H. Future F'l anni r.g Cai ender <br />There was no action required on this item. <br />C. Gateway Square <br />Mr. Swift pr-esented the nevi ew of tt-ie bui I di ng eI evert i ons at <br />vateway Square, noting that the City has redesigned the building <br />ther-e located on Stoneridge I?rive. There were no objections or-~ <br />questions from the Coms~riissioners and no action :-gas required. <br />COt'1MUN I CAT I OIVS <br />There were none. <br />t='age 1 i <br />