19 Attachments - Laserfiche WebLink

F. Matters Before the Committee a. Re~•icw actin itics at September 1~ meetin; I3ecausc a large number of meeting attendees were nev`~ to the process_ Lorie ~l~inl~~~~ summarized activities that occurred at the September 1=1 meetin~~. She discussed the elements that ~~~erc summarized on a spreadsheet with the different alignment options. h. Clarifi~ Committee ~~ote on Option D taken at September 14 meeting At the mectin~~ six ofthe ten committee meu~bers presented noted for Option D (the road ali~mment associated ~~~ith the Grecnbriar Homes project). .fit the time. Lorie stated that the vote did not represent a majority because the entire connnittcc is comprised of 12 members so six is only half. Hovt~ever. the total voting ~~as ten (vthich constituted a quorum) so six ~ otcs did reflect a majority opinion. Tom Smith stated he didn't feel that the vote should count because it was late and there were just no real arguments. Kellen Aura a~.*reed ~~~ith Tom's statement. Wes Fehon disagreed and said a quorum is a quortm~ and it should count Lorie stated that there was a vote and a presentation requested from Pat Costanzo and instructed the committee that they can revisit the item after the presentation. c. Presentation b~~ Grecnbriar Homes of rep°ised deg°elopmcnt proposal Pat Costanzo presented the proposal Ibr 6 ~ lots. The lot sizes arc 1 ,.200 sq ft to 21,000 sq ft. F.d from Grecnbriar described the plans and elevations. The one-story homes are up to _'~ ft and the two story homes are up to ,O ft in height 1~hc sin~~le story home plans are calculated at .~10 FAR, the ttiu-stork plans are calculated at . iOhAR and the ;0.000 sq ft lots arc calculated at ."'~ FAR. I lalf of the development is planned to be single story homes. "there are four different plans proposed with three different elevations per plan. 'There is no park planned. Pat also introduced a development with 70 homes v1°ith similar parameters. d. Questions and comments by~ Committee members Several questions were asked about the doll~u~s necessary for the bypass road and questions about profit margin. Pat declined to comment. Roger Manning and AI Schorno asked for confirmation from Pat that the bypass road ~~-ould be built lirsi. and t!,er, the de~~elepment. Pat indicated that he had said they ~rould lie built concurrently. Pete Richert asked how hi~ah the dirt ~~rould be built up on the flat from constructin~~ the b~•pass road. Pat said the elevations would be ~ cried up to fi~ur feet. Roger asked hov, many lots arc on Westbridge on the proposal ~~~ith 7U homes. Pat answered there ~~ould be eight homes on Westbridge. c. Questions and comments by audience members Audience Member: Would V~-estbridae be closed'' Pat Costanzo: Yes Audience Member: V~'ould traffiic studies be done on :1lisal or S~ camorc Creek Way `' Pat Costanzo: Sycamore Creek vv~as built to accunul~odate the traffic from this development and more. .~~udience Member: ~"h~ are ~°ou talking as if you~re aoin2 do~~ n 11~om 102 homes, but Fm lookin~~ at it as goin« up:'. Lorie Tinfo~-~ : The total number of units has cyolyed as a ne~~otiations to he able to ~~et the property for the road. Audience Member: Greenbrier made the development acrosti the road. hov` hi~~ is that one? FNBRC >Vliuutes 09-28-06 2