Laserfiche WebLink
«~hat the safe capacit} is for the roads in Rapp} Valle} . Mike explained that the <br />most useful a~~ailable data is on Sycamore G-cel: hecausc the City of Pleasanton <br />constructed the road. Sycamore Creek is designed to held up to 9.000 rehicles <br />per day ibr approximately ?0 ~~ears before requiring more asphalt. Currentl. there <br />arc approsimatel} 1.110 ~chicles per da}. Mike shared that the City ~~~ill tvpicall~ <br />hegira to get complaints from residents in areas c~periencing ,.000 or more <br />~~ehicles per dad°. <br />Patrick Custanro. Jr. presented a ~ ideo demunsll~ation of the Greenbriar proposal <br />for a br~pass road option. Patrick clarified that Greenbriar currently has a proposal <br />in to the Cit. of Plcasant~» ~ for 79 units o^ this de~rlopment but it has not been <br />appror~cd to date. <br />Several comments ~~~ere made rep=arding concerns ahorrt the density of housin~~ on <br />the Spotorno propcrt~. Concerns ~~ere also expressed that there ~~~as a link <br />bet~~een the ijensit~ of the housing and Grecnbriar's financial conU-ibution to the <br />h~pass road. I_.orie Tinfr» clarified that the goal of the committee is to only Tool: <br />at bypass road options. not the densit~~ of housing. <br />d) ~.dditional inl~n~matiun requested b~ the committee for nest meetin«s: <br />i. Physiril reyuircments fin- am h~~pass road <br />ii. "kraflic Data <br />iii. A-lap ~~ith alternate roads preyiousl~ considered <br />i~. ~fhc conunittec a~~reed to ~.i°all: the path(s) of ~m~ proposed bypass road(s). <br />G. Topics fo-• ticst 1lcetin~; <br />Nothin~~ additional <br />H. Adjournment- Lone finicn~< adjourned the meeting at 9:;0 PM <br />HVBRC Minutes 06-05-06 3 <br />