Laserfiche WebLink
In response to an inquiry by Chairperson hox regarding a threshold of 25 children, <br />Mr. O'Callaghan replied that if a zoning ordinance allows a specific business in a certain <br />location, that in advance of the business opening, he did not believe the parking should be <br />as much of a consideration because the commercial business site itself would already be <br />vested for parking requirements. IIe noted that in-lieu fees may be the best solution and <br />that he was not in favor of overregulating such issues. <br />Commissioner Ulson did not believe the Brown net prevented an applicant from talking <br />to him offline, one on one, and getting his opinion. IIe noted that it did prevent the <br />Commission from discussing his application as a group and out of the public eye; they <br />routinely met with applicants within the limits of the Brown Act. <br />Kurt hummer, 4456 Clovewood Lane, noted that he was a member oCthe Parla and <br />Recreation Conunission and the Trails Ad Iloc Committee but was speaking as a private <br />resident. IIe supported the streamlining of the process and noted that at the previous City <br />Council meeting, he had requested that an item about the math tutoring center be <br />removed from Consent in order to be discussed. IIe asked City Council if it thought it <br />was appropriate if such Planning Commission-specific conditions requiring that children <br />be escorted into and out of the facility were appropriate. He noted that if his children <br />needed such a private instruction service and that if he had looked at various facilities <br />around town and done his own due diligence, that should be his decision. [Ie added that <br />if he wished to sit in the facility for the entire time, that was also his decision. IIe <br />believed that if he wished to bring his child in when they felt comfortable there and then <br />went to get coffee, that should also be his decision. He believed that if he wanted his <br />child to ride his bike to and from the lacility, that should be his decision. [Ie was <br />particularly interested in Commissioner Blank's encouragement of people to wall: and <br />ride bikes in town and did not believe it made sense to be required to drive children when <br />they could ride their bikes. He inquired whether it was necessary to sign in and out every <br />10-year-old who wanted to play soccer, or to escort every lourih grader in and out of <br />class. He did not know where this practice would stop and believed it was particularly <br />inappropriate for a Planning Commission to make this requirement of local businesses. <br />He supported streamlining and noted that this issue of escorting was a recent decision by <br />the Planning Commission. <br />THF. PUQLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Blank expressed concern that every other noise measurement seen by the <br />Commission ha been expressed in dBA, and he did not know what the measurements <br />presented means. Ms. Decker suggested that staff revise that language and state that the <br />noise levels need to comply with the current zoning code noise levels. The Commission <br />concurred with that suggestion. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired whether staff felt the recd to call out the noise issue and <br />agreed with Mr. O'Callaghan's suggestion that businesses simply need to comply with all <br />Federal, State, and local regulations. Ms. Dcckcr agreed with Commissioner Pearce's <br />suggestion and believed that it was sensible. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 14, 2007 Page 5 of 7 <br />