18 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

bulk and perhaps the floor area of the education building as it would now be one-story building not atwo-story building as noted on the 1999 Master Plan. The Commission at that time reviewed the master plan but did not take action. The residents on Golden Road voiced opinions strongly against the location of the education building shown either as in Exhibit A or as Alternative No. 1. They felt that allowing the construction of education building at the proposed location would provide an unbalanced parking therefore would result in additional traffic to ingress and egress the site via Golden Road, a residential street that does not have the capacity to sustain additional traffic. They wanted to locate the proposed education building at where the current modular buildings are. The proposed location, as well as the alternatives, conforms to the underlined zoning district. Providing a permanent building for the existing preschool is in the best interest of the community. Staff is in support of the proposed development. XI. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the following options: If the Planning Commission finds that the proposed development, shown as Exhibit A is in conformance to the General Plan, and that the Planning Commission can make the required conditional use findings as listed in the staff report, staff recommends the Commission approve the conditional use permit and the design review applications, Case PCUP-155 and PDR-531, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "B". 2. If the Planning Commission finds that the proposed development shown as Exhibit A, but with the "Option No. 1"site plan is in conformance to the General Plan, and that the Planning Commission can make the required conditional use findings as listed in the staff report, staff recommends the Commission approve the conditional use permit and the design review applications, Case PCUP-155 and PDR-531, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "B-1". 3. If the Planning Commission finds that the proposed development shown as Exhibit A but with the suggested Option No. 2 site, is in conformance to the General Plan, and that the Planning Commission can make the required conditional use findings as listed in the staff report, staff recommends the Commission approve the conditional use permit and the design review applications, Case PCUP-155 and PDR-531, subject to the conditions of approval listed in Exhibit "B-2". Staff Planner: Jenny Soo, 925.931.5615 or email: jsoolh~ci.pleasanton.ca.us Corse No. PCUP-ISS/PDR-513 Plcrrrning Commission Pcrge - I S -