Laserfiche WebLink
Green Building <br />The proposed project is tinder the threshold required to obtain a certified rating on the LEED- <br />NC rating system in accordance with the City's Green Building ordinance. Staff strongly <br />encourages the applicant to obtain some of the LEED points if not all of the required 26 points. <br />In discussion of the LEED requirements, the applicant expressed interest in complying with <br />LEED requirements at its best, and indicated that they intend to use energy star appliances and <br />use water-efficient plants for the project. Staff has added a condition of approval (Condition <br />No.l l) encouraging the applicant completes a LEED checklist and comply with LEED <br />requirements at its best. <br />Parking and Circulation <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code requires that a church with an on-site school provide the larger <br />of the number of parking spaces required for the church or that required for a school use. As <br />previously mentioned, the proposed expansion plan does not include the expansion of the <br />existing preschool program. Thus, the required parking would be calculated based on the church <br />expansion. The parking requirement for churches is one space for every six seats, or 52 spaces <br />for Trinity Lutheran that currently has 310 fixed seats. The applicant proposes a total of 102 <br />parking spaces, with 81 parking spaces located on the Golden Road side and the remaining 21 <br />spaces located on the Del Valle Parkway side. <br />While the number of parking spaces proposed for the site exceeds the minimum number of <br />required spaces per the Pleasanton Municipal Code, both staff and the church's experience has <br />been that parking demand is usually greater, particularly during special events and religious <br />holidays. The residents on Golden Road currently experience street parking issues during <br />services. Although no complaints have been filed with the City, the applicant believes that <br />providing additional on-site parking would alleviate any street parking issues that may currently <br />exist. <br />The applicant has considered the suggestion of connecting the two parking lots. They decided <br />not to connect the parking lots for the following reasons: <br />^ Not to have a driveway running between the buildings that is meant for pedestrian uses; <br />^ Not have to vehicles passing by an on-site playground for a preschool; <br />^ Not have to have cut-through traffic. <br />The proposed parking layout has been reviewed and accepted by Livermore-Pleasanton Fire <br />District. <br />Case No. PCUP-155/PDR-513 Planning Commission <br />Puge - 11 - <br />