My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
032007
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
19 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:06:45 PM
Creation date
3/15/2007 12:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/20/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
19 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Building Desk <br />Staff believes that the proposed building is attractive and contains design elements that add <br />visual interest to the elevations. The architecture, colors, and materials of the building will <br />generally match that of the existing flopyard Village Shopping Center buildings. Staff also <br />finds the building height to be acceptable and compatible with the surrounding structures. <br />The windows along the northern building wall of the 744 square -foot tenant space are required <br />to meet a one -hour fire rating by the Building Code because they are located less than 10 feet <br />from the northern property line. The applicants are proposing to utilize wire glass to meet the <br />one -hour fire rating. Staff would normally be concerned with the aesthetics of wire -glass <br />windows. In this case, the northern building wall would not be visible from off -site public view <br />and staff finds its use to be acceptable. <br />Regarding colors and materials of the buildings, staff generally believes that the colors and <br />materials will complement the building architecture and would be compatible with the other <br />Hopyard Village Shopping Center buildings. Staff's only concern is with the proposed light <br />green eave and rafter tail color, which is not used on the existing Hopyard Village Shopping <br />Center buildings. Staff believes that the light green color is too intense, and recommends that it <br />be substituted with the same brown color used on the other Hopyard Village buildings or that it <br />be a bit more "subdued" than the proposed green color. A condition of approval addresses this <br />item. <br />Signage <br />"tenants in the adjacent Hopyard Village Shopping Center currently have internally illuminated <br />metal cabinet signs with Plexiglas faces and copy mounted on the building eaves above the <br />storefront. A new comprehensive sign program was recently approved for Hopyard Village that <br />changes the tenant signs to internally illuminated metal cabinet signs with aluminum <br />backgrounds with push- through Plexiglas copy. With respect to the subject building, conceptual <br />signage has been shown on the proposed building elevations. Individual - lettered wall signs are <br />shown on the upper portions of the south and west sides of the tower elements. Because the <br />proposed building will be adjacent to and has been designed to generally match the architecture <br />of the Hopyard Village Shopping Center buildings, staff believes that the building signage <br />should be consistent with the new IIopyard Village sign program. The applicants have agreed to <br />make this change and a condition of approval addresses this item. <br />Landscape Plan <br />A variety of trees, shrubs, vines, and groundcovers are proposed around the building and <br />parking lot. Proposed plant species include crape myrtle, ornamental pear, and liquidambar <br />trees; agapanthus, daylily, photinia, and smoke tree shrubs; violet trumpet vine; star jasmine <br />Page - 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.