Laserfiche WebLink
Tree Report, Vineyard Pass Subdivision HortScience, Inc. <br />Pleasanton, CA Page 5 <br />April 5, 2006 <br />Table 2: Tree Suitability for Preservation, continued. <br />Poor Trees in this category are in poor health or have significant defects in <br />structure that cannot be abated with treatment. These trees can be <br />expected to decline regardless of management. The species or individual <br />tree may possess either characteristics that are undesirable in landscape <br />settings or be unsuited for use areas. Fourteen (14) trees were rated as <br />having poor suitability for preservation. <br />Tree No. Species Diameter <br />(in.) Heritage <br />Tree? <br />66 Italian stone pine 14 No <br />69 Coast redwood 4,3 No <br />70 Italian stone pine 11,11 No <br />72 Italian stone pine 13,9 No <br />74 Italian stone pine 14 No <br />75 Italian stone pine 8 No <br />76 Italian stone pine 8 No <br />77 Fruitless mulberry 8 No <br />80 Fruitless mulberry 8 No <br />84 Giant sequoia 8 No <br />85 Fruitless mulberry 8 No <br />89 Italian stone pine 8 No <br />90 Monterey pine 10 No <br />92 {talian stone pine 9 No <br />Evaluation of Impacts and Recommendations for Preservation <br />Appropriate tree retention develops a practical match between the location and intensity of <br />e construction activities and the quality and health of trees. The Tree Survey Form was the <br />~; reference point for tree condition and quality. Potential impacts from construction were <br />evaluated using the Site Plan by M I Architects (September 6, 2005). <br />The plan depicted the footprint of the existing house and proposed two story house. Anew deck <br />will be located on the south side of the house. A patio and swimming pool are planned on the <br />northwest side of the house. The driveway apron at the house will be enlarged. Surveyed tree <br />locations were not shown on the Topographic Map by Govers Engineers (September 1, 2005). <br />Impacts to trees will occur in several ways. Demolition of existing site improvements such as <br />the house, driveway, walkways and hidden features may damage both tree roots and crowns. <br />Providing access for construction may require pruning of tree crowns. Excavation and grading <br />to construct the proposed improvements may damage tree roots both directly through <br />mechanical injury, and indirectly by altering soil structure, drainage, and biology. <br />Using these plans, potential impacts from construction were estimated for each tree. The most <br />significant impacts to the trees would occur as a result of the demolition and construction for the <br />house, driveway, deck, patio and pool. Based upon my evaluation of the Plans, I recommend <br />preservation of 16 trees (Table 3, next page), including two Heritage trees (#71 and 91). Five <br />(5) Italian stone pines (#70, 72, 74, 75 and 76), with poor suitability for preservation, were <br />included in the trees recommended for preservation. They were located south of the house in <br />the 30' wide setback area. I recommended their preservation for screening value between lot 1 <br />and the Foxborough Estate development to the south. These pines do not threaten the new <br />house and are located in a low use area. It would be appropriate to plant new trees between <br />these pines and gradually remove the pines over the next five to seven years. <br />