Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Frank Coda, project architect, addressed the trip generation issue and noted that there had not <br />originally been a category for home improvement store and that a shopping center category had <br />been used. He noted that Home Depot would be willing to work with a specific truck route, and <br />estimated that 30 to 40 percent ofthe trucks were Home Depot-controlled; the rest were operated <br />by outside vendors. He encouraged the City to implement controls on Valley A venue, if <br />possible. He displayed the design that had been created specifically for Pleasanton and noted <br />that it was intended to provide a harmonious design. He displayed an animated tour around the <br />project site. He noted that Condition No. l.d. related to the seasonal sales and believed that the <br />condition to limit it to Christmas tree sales only was very problematic for them. They suggested <br />using a temporary use permit to use during other times than Christmas; they have sold flowers, <br />pumpkins, rugs, or barbeques. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding temporary use permits, Mr. Pavan <br />advised that they were handled by staff. <br /> <br />Mr. Coda noted that Condition No. 5.a. of Exhibit E addressed the site lighting height, which <br />they discussed at length with staff. He believed the 20-foot height would present a visual <br />problem in the parking lot; they had proposed a 25- or 28-foot height. They did not intend to <br />exceed the building height and was concerned that the 20-foot high lights would create very <br />bright spots without providing even illumination, <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that originally, 30-foot high light standards were discussed, and acorn lighting <br />for pedestrians were included in the plans as well. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding whether Home Depot would be <br />amenable to limiting the hours of operation for the trucks, Mr. Coda replied that they would to <br />some extent. Commissioner Blank did not want to have trucks disrupting the synagogue's <br />services on Friday night or Saturday morning, and that situation would be a deal-breaker for his <br />support ofthis project. Mr. Coda inquired whether the trucks could be accommodated at another <br />time to make up for the lost travel time as requested; he noted that they had to accommodate a <br />certain volume of truck traffic. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Acting Chairperson Fox regarding whether the other Home Depot <br />store would remain open and how the redirected traffic may affect the project area if it closed, <br />Mr. Coda noted that they did not intend to close the store, but that it may be remodeled or <br />re-tenanted. He added that should the store close, not all the traffic would come to the project <br />site, He believed it would be dispersed between the other the stores as well as the new Lowe's <br />going into Dublin. He did not believe the Planning Commission could put conditions of <br />approval on a business item, as opposed to planning items. He noted that it was unlikely that a <br />split delivery would occur, where a truck would deliver to one store and then another. Generally, <br />one truck would be packed with goods for only one store to increase efficiency. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that flexibility in language as determined by the City Engineer should be <br />added to the conditions of approval with respect to bioswales and separated sidewalks. <br /> <br />A recess was called at 9:06 p.m. <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 13,2006 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 16 <br />