Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether an ordinance could be created <br />to make Valley Avenue between Santa Rita Road and First Street closed to truck traffic, <br />Mr. Tassano noted that the Municipal Code was not set up to define any given truck route. <br />However, trucks were allowed on these streets if they were headed for a commercial destination. <br />He noted that an enforcement effort was ongoing. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman believed the Commissioners were asking whether an ordinance could be adopted <br />prohibiting trucks on certain streets. She noted that the Vehicle Code in State law provides that <br />the State controlled the streets unless they gave the City the specific authority in certain areas. <br />She added that she would research that issue further. She believed the City could decide where <br />trucks would be allowed. As far as conditioning this specific project, it would be done as an <br />ordinance rather than in the conditions of approval. <br /> <br />Commissioner O'Connor believed the last meeting included specific discussion of the Home <br />Depot trucks traveling from 1-580 to Isabel Avenue rather than through Stanley Boulevard; he <br />did not see that mentioned in the conditions of approval. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman did not recall that specific discussion but noted that the City has encouraged <br />particular routes in past projects. <br /> <br />Commissioner O'Connor believed the Commission addressed Home Depot trucks in particular. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that it would be very difficult to enforce such a condition in that manner unless <br />there was signage stating that trucks delivering Home Depot goods be identified. She noted that <br />could take excessive police resources. She noted that it may be more practical to encourage <br />certain routes and for Home Depot to work with City staff to determine the best routes for its <br />operational plan. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding why Condition No. 5.h. stated <br />that the 60 KV lines would not undergrounded, Mr. lost explained that the City ordinance <br />exempts anything over 43 KV from being required to be constructed underground. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O'Connor regarding whether the Commission could <br />require the undergrounding as part of the conditional use permit, Ms. Decker replied that could <br />happen; however, staff has known of other projects where PG&E has indicated that it did not <br />prefer 60 KV lines to be underground. Staff would prefer some flexibility for this potential <br />condition so staff could work with PG&E to determine whether that would be possible. <br /> <br />With respect to the preferred routing regarding the Isabel Avenue/Stanley Boulevard truck route, <br />Commissioner Blank inquired whether a condition could be crafted for Home Depot-controlled <br />trucks to be required to follow a certain route and a penalty imposed if that route is not followed. <br />Ms. Harryman noted that could be possible, <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding the 100- foot green belt to act as a <br />visual and sound buffer between Home Depot and the synagogue, Mr. Pavan replied that at the <br /> <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 13,2006 <br /> <br />Page 3 of 16 <br />