My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 90048
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
RES 90048
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2012 4:09:18 PM
Creation date
8/12/1999 5:58:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/6/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COLrNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEAS~YTON <br /> <br />ALA~MIEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 80-74 <br /> <br />A .~LESOLUTION APPROVING COUNTY-WIDE ~THOD FOR <br />REDISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TAX P~VENUES FOLLOWING <br />A/TNEXATION OR CERTAIN OTHER JURISDICTIONAL CHANGES. <br /> <br />W~.EP~EAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (A~-8) <br /> provides, among other things, that no local agency <br /> jurisdictional change (other than a city incorporation <br /> or a formation of a district) can be completed without <br /> the agencies affected by such change first having agreed <br /> upon a redistribution of property tax revenue from <br /> such area between and among said agencies; and <br /> <br />the Alahneda County haYors' -Conference on March 12, 1980, <br />reviewed ~nd endorsed as equitable a policy proposal <br />subnuitted by the Alameda County Administrator which, <br />in pertinent part, calls for a redistribution of pro- <br />perty tax revenues currentlx derived from an unincorpo- <br />rated territory which is proposed to be annexed to a <br />city, in the following maruner: <br /> <br />In all annexations involving developed or developing <br />residential territory, as well as m/xed residential/ <br />commercial areas and vacant or ~nderdeveloped in- <br />dustrially zoned areas, the City would automatically <br />be entitled to receive an allocation of ~he County's <br />general fund computed property tax revenue from that <br />area equal to the City's/County existing allocation <br />percentage ratio within its corporate linzits; <br /> <br />Should a substantial portion of any annexation include <br />a developed commercial area, the County will under- <br />taJ~e an analysis of nonproperty tax revenues vs. <br />County service costs in determ/nLng what portion, if <br />any, of the. County allocation is redistributed; and <br /> <br />In the event that a City assumes full responsibility <br />for a service or services presently provided by a <br />separate County taxing agency or special district within <br />a territory proposed to be annexed, pursuant to Revenue <br />and Taxation Code Sec. 99(b), the County will endeavor <br />to transfer to the City the entire computed property <br />tax revenue presently allocated to Such County agency <br />or district from said area. <br /> <br />/// <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.