Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A -Scope of Work <br />^ Meeting or Exceeding Minimum (Tazgeted) Debt Service Coverage Ratios <br />The final results of this process will be a three-year projection of the rate adjustments required to <br />support the financial plan (O&M and capita] funding). Reserves/rate stabilization funds may be <br />used to moderate any large rate adjustments that maybe needed. <br />Expected City Staff Support for Task 1.5: For this task, the City will be expected to: <br />^ Assist "as-needed" in the development of the final financial plans. <br />^ Participate in a conference call to discuss the draft financial plans. <br />Deliverables as a Result of Task 1.5 -Develop Multi-Year Financial Plans. From the work <br />accomplished above, the deliverables for this task will be as follows: <br />^ A financial plan (revenue requirement) for the three yeaz period of FY 2007/08 - FY 2009/10. <br />^ A financial plan that incorporates, as appropriate, the City's proposed financial/rate setting <br />policies. <br />^ A final capital financing plan within the revenue requirement analysis, utilizing the City's <br />comprehensive plans or capital budget, which attempts to maximize capital expenditures, while <br />minimizing the impacts to customers over time. <br />^ A projection of key financial indicators (debt service coverage, capital replacement, reserve <br />levels, etc.). <br />Task 1.6-Prepare Cost-of-Service Analysis <br />Task Objective: Develop an average embedded cost of service study to equitably allocate the <br />local sewer revenue requirements to the customers served by the City. <br />Given the results of the revenue requirements/financial plan, the City's local sewer costs will be <br />allocated to the various customer classes of service using an average embedded cost of service <br />methodology. In simplified terms, a cost of service study attempts to equitably allocate the <br />revenue requirements between the various customer classes of service (e.g. residential, multi- <br />family, commercial, etc.). A brief discussion of the major steps associated with the cost of <br />service analysis is provided below. <br />STEP 1 -SELECTION OF TEST PERIOD AND METHOD -The f1rSt Step Of a COSY Of Serv1Ce 1S t0 <br />select a time period for the allocation of costs. This is similar to the revenue requirement time <br />period selection process noted above. A cost of service analysis typically reviews a 1 to 2 yeaz <br />time period, or the period over which sewer rates will ultimately be set. In the City's case, <br />allocating FY 2007/08 revenue requirements may be appropriate. The selection of this test <br />period for the cost of service will be discussed and confirmed with the City. <br />Similaz to the revenue requirements, the City may use a "cash basis" or "utility/accrual basis" <br />methodology for the cost of service study. In this particular case, given that the revenue <br />requirements are developed on a "cash basis" approach, HDR would recommend that same <br />methodology for the cost of service. <br />STEP Z -REVIEW OF SYSTEM DATA AND CHARACTERISTICS- h1 developlrig a COSt Of Service <br />analysis, an important aspect of equitably allocating costs is understanding the system and the <br />data available to allocate costs. This step will review the City's system to help determine the <br />L ~ Comprehensive Local Sewer Rate Study A-7 <br />1 ~f City of Pleasanton <br />