My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 90031
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
RES 90031
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2012 4:00:26 PM
Creation date
8/12/1999 5:47:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/6/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTOM <br /> <br />ALAPLEDA COUNTY, CALIFOP~NIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 80-74 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNTY-WIDE ~THOD FOR <br />REDISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TAX P~EVENUES FOLLOWING <br />A/~NEXATION OR CERTAIN OTHER JURISDICTIONAL CHANGES. <br /> <br />~HEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (AB-8) <br /> provides, among other things, that no local agency <br /> jurisdictional change (other than a city incorporation <br /> or a formation of a district) can be completed without <br /> the agencies affected by such change first having agreed <br /> upon a redistribution of property tax revenue from <br /> such area between and among said agencies; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Alameda County hayors' 'Conference on ~4arch 12, 1980, <br /> reviewed and endorsed as equitable a policy proposal <br /> submitted by the Alameda County Administrator which, <br /> in pertinent part, calls for a redistribution of pro- <br /> perty tax revenues currently derived from an unincorpo- <br /> rated territory which is proposed to be annexed to a <br /> city, in the following manner: <br /> <br />In all annexations involving developed or developing <br />residential territory, as well as mixed residential/ <br />commercial areas and vacant or underdeveloped in- <br />dustrially zoned areas, the City would auto~m~tically <br />be entitled to receive an allocation of the County's <br />general fund c'omputed property tax revenue from that <br />area equal to the City's/County existing allocation <br />percentage ratio within its corporate limits; <br /> <br />Should a substantial portion of any annexation include <br />a developed commercial area, the County will under- <br />take an analysis of nonproperty tax revenues vs. <br />County service costs in determining what portion, if <br />any, of the. County allocation is redistributed; and <br /> <br />In the event that a City assumes full responsibility <br />for a service or services presently provided by a <br />separate County taxing agency or special district within <br />a territory proposed to be annexed, pursuant to Revenue <br />and Taxation Code Sec..99(b), the County will endeavor <br />to transfer to the City the entire computed property <br />tax revenue presently allocated to Such County agency <br />or district from said area. <br /> <br />/// <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.