My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
25A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
25A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:10:43 PM
Creation date
1/12/2007 11:04:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
25A
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
69
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Examvle 16A. Assume the simplifying assumption of a Specific Plan with 100 <br />units in the Plan Area. with four i'1frastructure improvements cost 55.000, <br />515,000.530.000. and 550.000 respectively. In Year 1. De,'eloper A builds 10 <br />units and installs the 55,000 improvement. Developer A pays 55.000 into the <br />Fund to equal the 510.000 total share his 10 units represent of the total 5100.000 <br />improvement cost. In Year 1 City installs the 515,000 improvement usinK its <br />waterfund. bur its cost is 520.000. In Year 2, Developer B builds 50 ullits <br />requiring no infrastructure. Developer B will pay afte equal to: <br /> <br />Unconstructed i'1frastructure: 550,000 + 530,000. <br />adjustedfor 5% inflation {$4.000} <br />City-funded infrastructure not using Specific Plan funds, + <br />adjusted for 8% reimbursement ($20.000 @ 8% interest) <br />54.000 City administrationfee + <br />(55.000 F UM balance adjusted for interest earned @ 4%) <br /> <br />584.000 <br />521.600 <br /> <br />5 .1.000 <br /><55.200> <br />5104,.100 <br /> <br />-i- 90 units remaining = 51,160/unit, orJor 50 units. 558.000 <br /> <br />Examvle 16B. Assuming the same simplifying assumptions as in Example 16A. in <br />Year 1 Developer A constructs the 550,000 improvementfor 555.000 and builds <br />20 units. He pays no fee and is eligible for reimbu,.sement o{555.000 - 521.()()O <br />= $34,000 (adjusted lot share cost = 51.050; total share is lOx 51.050 = <br />511.000). In Year 3 Developer B constructs the $15.000 improvememfiw <br />520,000 and builds 30 units. Develope,. B pays afee equal to: <br /> <br />. unconstructed i'1frastructure 55.000 + 530.000 <br />. plus Developer B's cost for infrastructure <br />. plus inflation@ 5%for 1 yearsfor <br />unconstructed infrastructure <br />$35.000@ 1.05 x 1.05 - $35,000 <br />. plus balance of reimbursable costs <br />. plus interest@ 8%for 1 yearsfor <br />reimbursable costs <br />$34.000@ 1.08 x 1.08 - $34.000 <br />. plus two years' administration fee <br />.. less Fund balance <br /> <br /> 535.000 <br />= 520.(){)O <br />- $ 3.588 <br />= 534.{)O() <br /> <br />$ 5.658 <br />5 8.000 <br /> <br />----0..-- <br />5106,246 <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />. divide by remaining lots <br />(including project) [80 units) <br /> <br />= <br /> <br />51. 328/unit <br /> <br />Thus. Developer B would pay 30 units x $I,328/unit = 539,840. less the credit lor <br />installed i'1frastructure ($20.000), or a total of$19.840. This would go into the <br />Fund Developer A would be eligible for the pro rata reimbursement from <br />Developer B's payment into the Fund. This would he 30 units' share of the <br />improvement installed ($55,000). or 30/100ths of$55.000 = 516.500. Developer <br /> <br />1] <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.