Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In addition to the above, the Draft Methodology also includes an allocation of housing units <br />based on household incomes at the same ratio as the regional average income distribution. While <br />ABAG presented four allocation options, the HMC recommended the above approach because <br />each jurisdiction would receive the same proportion of housing units in each income category <br />(very-low, low, moderate, and above moderate). The regional average approved an allocation of <br />housing units by income levels based on the regional income distribution included in Census <br />2000 or data from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development that specifies <br />household income by household size. A summary of this distribution level is as follows: <br /> <br />DRAFT HOUSING METHODOLOGY BASED ON HOUSEHOLD INCOMES <br /> <br />Income Level Area Median Income* (AMI) Percental!:e of Affordable <br />Very Low Income Up to 50% AMI 23% <br />Low Income 50% - 80% AMI 16% <br />Moderate Income 80% - 120% AMI 19% <br />Above Moderate Income Above 120% AMI 42% <br />Total 100% <br /> <br />'In 2006, the Area Median Income for a famIly of four living in Alameda County is $86,300. <br /> <br />During ABAG's Executive Board meeting to review the HMC's recommendations, several <br />comments were received on the recommended methodology pertaining to the income allocation <br />component of the methodology. Some local jurisdictions believe the proposed income <br />allocation methodology does not do enough to alleviate existing concentrations of poverty. <br />There is concern that, because the draft recommendation assigns an "equal share" to each <br />jurisdiction and does not take a jurisdiction's existing income distribution into account, it <br />unfairly burdens jurisdictions with existing high concentrations of poverty. As a result, the draft <br />method is perceived to perpetuate regional social and economic inequities. <br /> <br />As a result of this concern, the HMC met on January 4 and developed a new recommendation <br />referred to as "Percent Adjustment Toward Regional Average." This methodology, which is <br />detailed on Attachment 3 page 2, adds a multiplier to the regional income average in an attempt <br />to change the income distribution in each jurisdiction to more closely match the regional <br />distribution. As a result, those jurisdictions that have a relatively low proportion of a specific <br />income category would receive a higher allocation of housing units in that category. The impact <br />of this new recommendation is as follows: <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />