Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Draft RHNA Allocation Methodology 10/26/06 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />l. Weighted Factors <br /> <br />Factors in the allocation methodology are the mathematical variables that allocate shares of the <br />regional housing need (RHN). The factors reflect: I) state mandated RHNA objectives; 2) RHNA <br />statutory requirements; 3) local policy and 4) regional policy. In the methodology, each factor is <br />given priority relative to the others. Priority is established through "weighting" in the formula. For <br />example, if one of the factors, household growth, is determined to be more important than another <br />factor, e.g., transit, the methodology can give household growth a higher weight than transit in the <br />formula. The methodology may also equally weight the factors, therefore ensuring that all the factors <br />are of equal priority. <br /> <br />A. Household Growth, 40 Percent <br /> <br />Each local jurisdiction should plan for housing according to regionally projected household growth <br />within its boundaries during the RHNA planning period (2007 - 2014). Household growth should be <br />weighted 40 percent in the allocation. Household growth is used as a factor, as opposed to existing <br />households or total households, to ensure that additional housing is not allocated where there are <br />existing concentrations of homes in the region, but rather where growth is anticipated to occur. In this <br />way household growth as a factor in the methodology ensures that the allocation is consistent with <br />both local plans for growth and with regional growth policies, as those areas that are planning for <br />household growth would receive a higher allocation than those areas not planning for growth. <br />Household growth in ABAG's Projections is most influenced by local land use plans and policies, <br />including planned and protected agricultural lands, open space and parks, city-centered growth <br />policies, urban growth boundaries, and any physical or geological constraints. <br /> <br />Regional policies have been incorporated into Projections since 2002, are assumed to go into effect <br />by 2010, and therefore have some effect on regional housing growth estimates in the 2007-2014 <br />RHNA period. Regional policies assume that there will be increased housing growth in existing <br />urbanized areas, near transit stations and along major public transportation corridors. These regional <br />policies are consistent with state housing policies to promote infill development, environmental and <br />agricultural protection and efficient development patterns. <br /> <br />B. Existing Employment, 20 Percent; Employment Growth, 20 Percent <br /> <br />Each local jurisdiction should plan for housing to accommodate existing employment (2007) and <br />regionally projected employment growth within its boundaries during the RHNA planning period <br />(2007 - 2014). This would ensure that the need allocation gives jurisdictions with both existing <br />concentrations of jobs and planned job growth a share of the regional housing need. This would direct <br />housing to existing job centers and to areas with anticipated employment growth. These jobs <br />allocation factors may address regional jobs-housing imbalance and facilitate access by proximity, for <br />housing would be directed to communities with jobs and planned jobs, which may reduce vehicle <br />miles traveled due to reduced inter- and intra-regional commuting. <br /> <br />C. Household Growth near Transit, 10 Percent; Employment Growth near Transit, 10 Percent <br /> <br />Each local jurisdiction with an existing or planned transit station should plan for more housing near <br />such stations. Current regional policy places incrementally more growth along major transportation <br />corridors and at transit stations. Therefore, a housing need allocation that uses regional housing <br />growth and employment as factors would be inclusive of "transit" as a policy issue. Using transit as a <br />