My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2007 12:07:47 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 3:15:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
23
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />PDQ - 501 {PCUP- fiL./- <br /> <br />. Horticultural Consultants <br /> <br />HOR1~~~EINC <br /> <br />" . <br /> <br />~~IEC~PJ'~D <br /> <br />Jill 2 d LIl06 <br /> <br />CITY CiC . ;:,01 <br />PL\:'j;';:i'<'; ;.~"":'l! r. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />June 28, 2006 <br /> <br />Stephanie Allen <br />John Miller Architects <br />100 View St., Suite 203 <br />Mountain View, CA 94041 <br /> <br />E.. \(IJ I p." '-" J~ <br />!dlh.JJ, <br /> <br />Subject: Tree Report <br />Saint Elizabeth Seton Church, Pleasanton <br /> <br />Dear Stephanie: <br /> <br />John Miller Architects is designing the proposed expansion of the Saint Elizabeth Seton <br />Church, in Pleasanton. The plan proposes to construct a new activity center at the west end <br />of the property, in what is currently an empty field. HortScience, Inc. was asked to prepare a <br />Tree Report for the site for review by the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br />This report provides the following information: <br /> <br />1. An evaluation of the health and structural condition of the trees from a visual <br />inspection. <br />2. An evaluation of the impacts of the proposed development on the trees. <br />3. The appraised value of individual surveyed trees. <br /> <br />I visited the site on Tuesday, June 6, 2006. The survey included all trees 6' and greater in <br />diameter. The survey procedure consisted of the following steps: <br /> <br />1. Identifying the tree as to species; <br />2. Tagging each tree with an identifying number and recording its location on a <br />map; <br />3. Measuring the trunk diameter at a point 54' above grade; <br />4. Evaluating the health and structural condition using a scale of 1 - 5: <br />5 - A healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of signs and symptoms of disease, <br />with good structure and form typical of the species. <br />4 - Tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor <br />structural defects that could be corrected. <br />3 - Tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning <br />of crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be <br />mitigated with regular care. <br />2 - Tree in decline, epicormic growth, extensive dieback of medium to large <br />branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. <br />1 - Tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and/or trunk; most of <br />foliage from epicormics; extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. <br /> <br />. PO Bux 754 <br /> <br />flleils3ntun, CA ~.I4ri6b <br /> <br />Pl1ollf'f.)?51(Q'-J211 <br /> <br />f-AX,t,2S,ISJ':n91J <br /> <br />f,'NW!llJltc.~i"IIGe,(:nl" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.