My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
011607
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2007 3:30:35 PM
Creation date
1/11/2007 1:04:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I~ <br />=- <br />BkF <br /> <br /> <br />mgd. We recommend that the operating and inspection records of the 16" force main he <br />evaluated to verify the condition of the pipes. If it is still in good condition, we recommend <br />keeping the 16" FM in service and installing a new 18" line and installing an inter-tie hetween the <br />existing] 6" line and the new 18" line to reduce the operating head. We will also verify the <br />pumping head and adequacy of the new 18" line if the existing 16" force main has to he replaced. <br /> <br />. Wc understand that the existing 200 KW emergency generator may not meet the air quality of <br />today's standard; thereforc a new generator size will be detcrmined and included for thc future <br />pump station. <br /> <br />3.2. Develop a preliminary layout to an acceptable scale and preliminary cost estimate for each <br />alternative that the consultant believes to be feasible for the site. Each alternative layout should <br />assure that the new pump station could be constructed adjacent to the existing station while the <br />existing station is maintained in full operational service. Feasible uninterrupted bypass pumping <br />plans for cutover between the existing and new pump station alternatives shall be considered in the <br />alternative analysis <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />BKF will develop a preliminary layout in a City-provided format and cost estimate for each feasible <br />alternative. We will achievc the following tasks: <br /> <br />· We will devclop a conceptual layout and cost cstimate for each alternative. <br /> <br />I~ <br /> <br />· The layouts will include an enclosurc which will house the MCC, eontrol panel, YFD. SCADE <br />system, air compressor for odor removal, ultrasonic level sensing device, emergency engine <br />gencrator, small office, bath room and maybe an emergency shower cleaning facility, recorder for <br />flow meter, lighting, air vcnt and storage area, and any other necessary or require equipments. <br /> <br />....1 <br />,l' <br />, <br />I: <br /> <br />· The alternatives will have the new pump station being located in thc vicinity of the existing pump <br />station with minimum interruption to the operation of the existing pump station. Every effort will <br />be made to layout the pump station inside the existing boundary and will keep any land <br />acquisition, if necessary, to a minimal. <br /> <br />. Cut over of existing wet well 24" and 33" inlet lines to the new pump station will bc carefully <br />coordinated to reduce the construction cost and interruption to the cxisting system. <br /> <br />3.3. Develop a benefit and drawback list for each alternative. The benefit, drawback and cost estimate <br />evaluation should include construction costs, operation and maintenance costs, building <br />maintenance, electrical power costs/considerations and equipment replacement ease and costs, <br />capacity, reliability, feasibility, service life, etc. <br /> <br />BKF will develop a benefit and drawback list and provide a cost estimate for each alternative. <br />BKF will work closely with City staff and operation personnel to obtain more existing pump <br />operation maintenance records in order to prepare more accurate operation and maintenance costs, <br />building maintenance, electrical power costs/considerations, and equipmcllI replact'mcnts ease and <br />cost, capacity, rcliahility, feasibility, the forcc main system, and service life etc. <br /> <br />3.4. Prepare comprehensive, draft alternative analysis/pre-design report that includes all of analysis, <br />layout, benefit, drawback, cost and other pre-design considerations mentioned above. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.