Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Workers' Compensation reserve. Additional funding may still be necessary and will be <br />reviewed in the next two-year budget cycle. <br /> <br />Emolovee Benefit Fund <br /> <br />The Employee Benefit Fund (EBF) is used to account for non-salary employee costs. The <br />departments' budgets are charged for benefit expenses as a percent of salary, and the dollars <br />then flow to the EBF, where the actual costs are recorded. For FY 2205-06, benefit costs were <br />under budget by $161,000, and revenues exceeded projections by $311,000, primarily because <br />contributions from the Operating Funds exceeded estimates. Thus net income is $472,000 <br />greater than projected for FY 2005-06. It was anticipated that for FY 2005-06, the Fund would <br />draw down $260,000 of its reserves leaving a $185,000 fund balance. Instead, the ending fund <br />balance is now $657,000. This fund balance could be used to smooth future budgets or provide <br />funding for Workers Compensation or Retiree Medical liabilities. Uses for the fund balance will <br />be examined as part of the next two-year budget process. <br /> <br />ALL OTHER OPERATING FUNDS <br /> <br />For the most part, budget variances are small for the other Operating Funds. Most of the <br />Landscape District Funds and Geologic Hazard District Funds were slightly under budget, with <br />expenditures less than budgeted. The exception was the Laurel Creek Geologic Hazard District <br />that had relatively significant additional revenue ($28,000) due to Kolb Ranch becoming part of <br />the district. <br /> <br />The Lower Income Housing Fund net income was close to budgeted amounts after significant <br />carryovers for both revenue and expenditures. Revenue carryovers of $290,000 include a <br />$390,000 HELP loan not received in FY 2005-06 and a $100,000 revenue reduction for housing <br />fees collected in FY 2005-06 though budgeted for FY 2006-07. Expenditure carryovers of <br />$611,000 include $470,000 for the down payment loan assistance program (funded by the State <br />with a match from the City) and $111,000 for the Kottinger Development Study. <br /> <br />The Recycling and Waste Management Fund actual revenue exceeded budget by $156,000 <br />during the year. Staff will analyze the Measure D funding received during the year to determine <br />if FY 2006-07 revenue should be adjusted. <br /> <br />For all other Operating Funds, budget to actual variances are small. Therefore staff is <br />recommending only a few minor budget changes, as outlined in Appendix A. <br /> <br />SR 06:259 <br /> <br />11 <br />