My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:271
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:271
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2006 12:32:18 PM
Creation date
11/29/2006 12:14:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/5/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:271
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman noted that it would not be so much a variance than a modification to the PUD, <br />along with a Specific Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker requested a five-minute recess to allow staff and counsel to confer on this matter. <br /> <br />A recess was called at 7:42 p.m. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Fox reconvened the meeting at 7:52 p.m. <br /> <br />After conferring with counsel, Ms. Decker clarified that with respect to Commissioner <br />O'Connor's question regarding a PUD modification to allow a setback reduction in the future, <br />not only a PUD modification but also a Specific Plan Amendment would technically be required <br />to actually reduce those setbacks, <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Mr. Don Babbitt, 9647 Crosby Drive, developer, noted that he would be satisfied with the <br />35-foot front and rear yard setbacks and added that only Lots 6 and II would be of concern <br />because of the parcel configurations. He noted that the lots had been intended for a tract <br />subdivision, and he turned them into a custom lot subdivision. <br /> <br />Acting Chairperson Fox noted that she was concerned about Lot 1 and any lot that was <br />9,000 square feet and over, such as Lots 6,8,9, 10 and 11. Mr. Babbitt noted that those listed <br />square footages were calculations indicating the allowable square footage for the floor area <br />ratio (FAR) as approved in the PUD. He did not believe houses that big would be built, although <br />the Happy Valley Specific Plan would allow it. He expected that the homes would be between <br />5,400 and 6,400 square-feet. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Acting Chairperson Fox regarding whether these were the same <br />home designs as those in Mariposa Ranch, Mr. Babbitt noted that the examples followed the <br />Mariposa Ranch design guidelines with respect to the style of homes in the area. He noted that <br />he has integrated several green building measures into his home design and encouraged the <br />buyers of his lots to do the same. He would rather get 150 points than 50 points and encouraged <br />everyone to put at least a two-kilowatt system on their roof. He noted that the home designs <br />were Craftsman and that he would never allow a purple house in this project. The homes would <br />be earth tone colors, which are consistent with the Craftsman style, He added that the CC&R's <br />would include a provision that colors outside that palette would not be allowed. <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Townsend, project architect, displayed the site plan and described its layout. He <br />described some of the green building measures, such as water tanks that pre-heat water before <br />they go into the tankless systems. The ducts would be run in an enclosed space instead of in a <br />crawlspace, which is more energy-efficient. He displayed the homes' elevations and described <br />the details characteristic of the Craftsman style, including traditional materials and muted colors. <br /> <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 18, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 2 of6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.