Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DRAFT <br /> <br />EXHIBIT F <br /> <br />PUD-Ol-9M. Mike RenQuist <br />Application for a major modification to an approved PUD for a single-family lot located at <br />2511 Yolanda Court to increase the maximum building height from 23 feet to 26 feet; to <br />allow a barrel tile roof; and to allow design review approval by the Planning Director. <br />Zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br />Residential) District. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker noted that while this application was also noticed for design review approval, the <br />Commission would only consider a major modification because this was originally a minor <br />modification application that was approved by the Zoning Administrator and forwarded to the <br />City Council. Councilmember Sullivan noted that he had reviewed this project while he was a <br />Planning Commissioner and recalled that he had some concerns about various issues, He wanted <br />the Commission to review this project first and provide some comment prior to its going back to <br />the City Council for action. She noted that it had been a pleasure to work with the applicants on <br />this project and that they had spent considerable time and effort in meeting with the Park District <br />personnel, Linda Chavez, and with staff. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker presented the staff report and described the background, layout, and scope of this <br />project. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether staff believed this <br />application would have been approved as an original application, Ms. Decker believed that <br />would have been the case, Commissioner Olson expressed surprise that this application had <br />returned to the Planning Commission for 2.5 feet. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br /> <br />Mike Renquist, applicant, noted that the pedestrian path that would be impacted by the height <br />increase was over 1,000 feet away from the property across the lake, This was the area that <br />would be visible to a hiker. He noted that the tiles were chosen to be consistent with the <br />Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan. <br /> <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank noted that he was surprised that the original PUD did not contain a <br />condition for automatic sprinklers. Ms. Decker confirmed that was correct. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank moved to find that the proposed modification is covered by the <br />previously approved Final Environmental Impact Report for the Vineyard Corridor <br />Specific Plan and the previously approved PUD development plan findings for PUD-Ol and <br />to recommend approval to the City Council of Case PUD-OI-09M, subject to the conditions <br />of approval as shown on Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staff, with the <br />addition of a condition that an automatic fire sprinkler system be installed in the residence <br />as specified by the Fire Chief of the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore. <br />Commissioner O'Connor seconded the motion. <br /> <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 25, 2006 <br /> <br />Page 1 of2 <br />