My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 92158
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
RES 92158
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/1/2012 11:22:30 AM
Creation date
8/6/1999 6:01:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
8/4/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Land cost is $300,000 per acre ($15,000 per unit), and <br />assumes minimal on- and off-site infrastructure <br />improvement costs: <br /> <br />Construction cost is $65 per square foot of building <br />floor area; <br /> <br />Fee payment is $12,000 per unit; <br /> <br />Soft costs including financing and design are 15 percent <br />of total cost; and <br /> <br />Construction standards and deeignqualityare assum~ <br />be somewhat higher than for the existing units due tc <br />more restrictive state and local building regulations <br />that have.been enacted in recent years. <br /> <br />The estimated cost of producing new rental housing in Pleasanton in <br />1992 is $92,000 per unit. Assuming a five percent per year <br />inflation rate and replacement in 1997 (mid-point of the second <br />five year interval), the total replacement cost of the 278 assisted <br />units would be approximately $32,000,.000. <br /> <br />cost of Preserving Rxisting Assisted Rental Housing <br /> <br />Without the benefit of having appraisal estimates for Pleasanton <br />Greens, Stoneridge Apartments and Hacienda Gardens, exact <br />preservation costs are difficult to determine. Instead of <br />obtaining appraisals, a variety of other relevant factors were <br />analyzed in considering preservation costs: <br /> <br />In some cases, the units were designed and constructed to <br />somewhat lower standards and on less expensive land in 1975 <br />and 1988 than the buildings of today, and .as such, would be <br />of slightly lower value. <br /> <br />The original physical condition of these units will <br />deteriorate and the value should decrease with the passing of <br />time. However, it is important to recognize that all three <br />projects have been and continue to be very well maintained. <br /> <br />The units will be 10 to 21 years old .upon the restriction <br />termination dates and probably in need some rehabilitation in <br />order to .bring them up to the standard of comparable new <br />housing. <br /> <br />The magnitude of difference in preservation versus production cost <br />estimates is generally considered by professional real estate <br />developers in the area to be apprgximately 15 percent less <br />depending upon age, physical condition, and neighborhood land <br />values. Assuming a five percent per year inflation rate and <br />replacement in 1997 (mid-point of the second year interval), the <br /> <br />- 5 - <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.