Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 92-139 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION REFERRING LITIGATION TO CITY <br />'ATTORNEY FOR APPROPRIATEACTIONTO DEFEND THE <br />CITY <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTONRESOLVES <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1: The Summons and Complaint in the United States District <br /> Court, Northern District of California, Case No. <br /> C-92-20278, in the matter of Jeffrey Garnaas v. City of <br /> Pleasanton, et al., served on the defendants on June 12, <br /> 1992, is hereby referred to the City Attorney for action <br /> as deemed necessary and appropriate to defend the city of <br /> Pleasanton, its officers, agents, and employees in said <br /> action, and the City Attorney is hereby authorized to <br /> incur expenses reasonably necessary for such purpose. <br /> <br />Section 2.: This resolution shall become effective immediately <br /> upon its passage and adoption. <br /> <br /> I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING WAS DULY AND <br />REGULARLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON, AT <br />A MEETING HELD ON JULY 7, 1992 BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Councilmembers - Butler, Mohr, Scribner, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Tarver <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Michael H. Roush, city Attorney <br /> <br />Pegg~ ~JE~idr~, City Clerk <br /> <br /> <br />