Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commission is going to support the second story addition, they would like the following as a part of <br />the conditions of approval: <br /> <br />. A 7-foot fence, (6-foot solid and I-foot lattice) paid lor by the applicants, to replace the <br />existing 4-foot 6-inch fence along the rear of their property; <br />. Non-deciduous trees that would not grow to a height above the elevation of the second-story <br />so that there is no removal of additional skyline; <br />. Elimination of any new windows on the rear elevation; and <br />. Reduction in square-footage, e.g. moving the stairs towards the east elevation, in order to <br />keep some of the view they currently receive. <br /> <br />3. Ron Imperiale, 798 East Angela, is not supportive of any second-story addition. Mr. Imperiale's <br />property is located to the rear and not contiguous to the subject site, but rather one lot to the east of <br />the Georgatos' property. His property is also elevated approximately 12-feet above the pad height of <br />the home on the subject site, with existing mature trees on the northwestern comer of subject <br />property and near Mr. Imperiale's property. Mr. Imperiale believes that: 1) the neighborhood was <br />not designed to have a second-story home in that location; 2) his privacy would be compromised; 3) <br />the second-story would be intrusive and an eye sore; 4) it would have a negative impact on future <br />property values; 5) his view would be obstructed and diminished; 6) his daily sun light would be <br />restricted; and 7) the second-story addition would change the "complexion" of his home and <br />surrounding homes. Mr. Imperiale feels that the neighborhood was designed and staged on a hill <br />with all the homes moved back or forward on their property lines so there would be privacy and still <br />afford a view and ample sunlight. Mr. Imperiale believes that if the project were supported, it would <br />change the design and degrade the original planner's intent and design of the neighborhood. He is <br />fine with a single-story addition; however, if the second-story were to be approved he requests the <br />following: <br /> <br />. That no additional landscaping be planted; and <br />. A 7-foot fence on his rear property line to be construction to match the existing fencing and <br />paid for by the applicants. <br /> <br />4. Tim Bennett, 784 East Angela, is not supportive of any second-story addition. Mr. Bennett's <br />property is not contiguous to the subject site, but rather one lot west of the Georgatos' property. As <br />proposed, the second-story would be added to the portion of the home furthest from Mr. Bennett's <br />property; which is also elevated approximately 12-feet above the pad height of the subject property, <br />with existing mature trees on southwest comer of the subject site near Mr. Bennett's rear comer. <br />Mr. Bennett opposes the addition because the second-story would remove privacy from his back <br />yard and house, obstruct his view, and devalue is property. He is fine with a single-story addition <br />and does not believe that there are any mitigation measures that would suffice in the approval of a <br />second-story. If the addition were to be supported, he requests that: <br /> <br />. The second-story be pushed back; <br />. Additional trees be planted on the southwest comer portion of the subject property; and <br />. An increase in fence height for his existing 8-foot tall fence. <br /> <br />PAP-93, AppealofPADR-1472 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br /> <br />Page JOof 15 <br />