Laserfiche WebLink
<br />DISCUSSION <br /> <br />The application for Mr. Boyce's project was denied by the Planning Commission. The applicant <br />feels that the Commissioners did not understand his project and appealed its decision on <br />September 28, 2006. <br /> <br />The First, Second, and Third Street neighborhoods located within the Downtown District are <br />changing. Due to the walkability of the neighborhood, the neighborhood's charm, and its <br />proximity to Pleasanton's thriving Downtown, families are being attracted to the neighborhood, <br />and families living in the neighborhood are desiring to remain, even as they age and grow. <br />Furthermore, residents have been wanting to update their interior floor plans to accommodate <br />modern living preferences, such as expanding kitchens, bathrooms, and closets, while retaining <br />the exterior architectural styles of their houses. Similar additions, over-height garages, and <br />increases in floor area ratio have previously been approved in the neighborhood. By allowing <br />well-designed additions in this neighborhood, the Downtown's residential district retains its <br />neighborhood charm while allowing families to grow and change in place creating a stable <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />The City Council has recognized that few of the City's standards zoning district regulations fit <br />the development pattern that has occurred from the early 1900s to today in the Downtown's <br />residential neighborhood. In accordance with a land use policy of the Downtown Specific Plan <br />(no. 13, page 29), the Council has discussed the need to rezone this neighborhood so that <br />acceptable proposals that do not meet the current development standards of the existing zoning <br />district can be approved without requiring variances. Although a Code amendment has not been <br />prepared to date, both Council and staff recognize the need for changes to the development <br />standards in this neighborhood. Of course, the existing neighbors would be an integral part of <br />this process and their input would help shape any resulting proposed code admendment. <br /> <br />Staff believes the proposed project would be harmonious with the character of Downtown and <br />the intent of both the Downtown Specific Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines. The <br />proposed design, colors, and materials are consistent with those of the existing house. Staff <br />believes that the applicant has taken care to match the steep (8/12) roof pitch of the existing <br />home in order to create an appropriate transition to the addition. The revision to incorporate the <br />second-story of the home into dormers has reduced both the overall height and massing of the <br />project. The proposed home now has the appearance of tht: two-story structure that it is, and <br />staff believes it blends in well with the neighboring homes. <br /> <br />While the proposed floor area ratio and the height of the garage require variances, these requests <br />are not out of step with several other projects previously approved in the neighborhood. The <br />garage height is further mitigated by its location at the rear of the lot. The majority of the garage <br />is set behind the house and is therefore not visible from the street. Additionally, due to the <br />sloping elevation of the subject site, the garage is built into the slope, and its height at the rear of <br />the lot is just over 1O.2-feet. Staff has added a condition of approval to the project that requires <br /> <br />SR 06:247 <br />Page 6 of8 <br />