My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:247
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:247
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:58:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:247
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Moore stated that the existing grade and landscaping would screen three quarters of <br />the first floor. <br /> <br />Ms. Mendez stated that primary structures are measured from the medium grade to the <br />median ridge point, we don't apply the same measurement technique to accessory <br />structures which we do measure from the lowest point to the highest point. She stated <br />that a variance would be needed because this structure is 29 feet high. <br /> <br />Finlay Boag stated that he has not had a problem in the past with people constructing <br />additions, but this project is over 5,100 square feet on such a small lot and the massive <br />height of 30 feet high in the back is just too much. He does not feel it is very consistent <br />with the neighborhood and does not support this project. <br /> <br />Grace Lutman agreed with Mr. Boag that this project is massive and way too high. She <br />mentioned that she would be the most affected party by this project. She also stated she <br />thought that the driveway was too narrow. <br /> <br />Ms. Mendez stated that the driveway, at 10 Y, feet from the home to the property line, <br />meets the minimum required 10-foot wide dimension. <br /> <br />Joseph Heman stated that the overall size of the structure is excessive and the height of <br />the project is too high. He also agreed with Mr. Boag that this project would be out of <br />character with the neighborhood. Mr. Hernan stated that his major concern if this project <br />was approved would be setting a precedent. He does not want to see more oversized <br />structures being proposed. <br /> <br />Ms. Lutman mentioned that the roots from two trees on her property might have to be cut <br />if this project gets approved. <br /> <br />Will Wahbeh stated that this project did not keep to the character ofthe neighborhood. <br /> <br />Arnold Abrott stated he was against the project because of the height and size of the <br />structure. <br /> <br />Charles Huff agreed with the neighbors regarding the floor area ratio. He also mentioned <br />his concern about setting a precedent. <br /> <br />Mr. Boyce stated he would consider a change of the project if the garage could <br />architecturally be designed to fit into the hillside and not look like the garage would be <br />coming out of the dirt. He stated that the garage attic storage brings the FAR over the <br />limit. <br /> <br />Ms. Mendez asked if the roof was 10 feet in the rear. <br /> <br />Mr. Boyce responded that is would be approximately 10 feet. <br /> <br />Minutes: PV-131/PADR-1338 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />September 15,2005 . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.