My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:247
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:247
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2006 2:58:00 PM
Creation date
10/12/2006 2:54:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/17/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:247
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />sory structures in the Downtown that exceed the 15-foot height limit, thereby creating a <br />distinctive neighborhood character. Staff therefore believes that the District provides a <br />special "locational" circumstance and that this first finding can be made for the height <br />variance. <br /> <br />(C) Increase in Floor Area Ratio <br /> <br />Similar to the above finding, the site's Downtown location is unique in that few of the <br />City's zoning district regulations fit the development pattern that has occurred from the <br />early 1900s to today in the residential neighborhood. The City has therefore supported <br />higher F ARs in this neighborhood. In addition, the subject lot is substandard in width <br />thereby reducing options for a home's layout and design. This fmding can therefore be <br />made. <br /> <br />2. That the granting of the variance will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsis- <br />tent with the limitation on other properties classified in the same zoning district; <br /> <br />(A) Decrease in Side Yard Setback <br /> <br />Many homes, including the subject home, in the Downtown R-1-6500 residential zoning <br />district have nonconforming side yard setbacks of less than the required five-foot mini- <br />mum. The Zoning Administrator has approved several variances to maintain the existing <br />side yard setback for new additions. The finding can therefore be made that the granting <br />of a variance from the side yard setback to maintain an existing nonconforming setback is <br />not a grant of special privilege. <br /> <br />(B) Increase in Accessory Structure Height <br /> <br />The maximum height of an accessory structure in all residential zoning districts is 15 <br />feet. Staff has approved several over-height accessory structures in the Downtown Revi- <br />talization District. This project is further mitigated by the sloping nature of the lot, where <br />the height ofthe garage at the rear ofthe lot is only 10.2 feet tall. This finding can there- <br />fore be made. <br /> <br />(C) Increase in Floor Area Ratio <br /> <br />The City has supported several increases in FAR in the Downtown residential neighbor- <br />hoods. This finding can therefore be made. <br /> <br />3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or <br />welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity. (Ord. <br />1520 ~ 5, 1991; prior code ~ 2-11.29(1)). <br /> <br />(A) Decrease in Side Yard Setback <br /> <br />The right side yard setback of the existing home is 3.85 feet. The applicant proposes to <br />build first- and second-story additions flush with the existing home. The request to reduce <br />the side yard setback can be supported because the existing setback has proven to not be <br /> <br />Item 6.b. PADR-1338/PV-131 <br /> <br />Page 12 of 14 <br /> <br />September 27. 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.