PC 10/25/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Tt~~__p ub 1 1 e t-ae~ar 3 no wm~tzs__o_paan ad_ _ Fred tiampy., ~C>C>C> Foothill F=COad~ represented the appl3c.atia=»n_ --fhe three plans were di splayed on the bulletin board _ Ha sai d hel i ve=, very close to the project i n di sca..assi on _ hie spo4;e of the long eroa_as driveways on Foothill Road and of his efforts to eliminate those dri veways_ He went to the bla_aepri nts and pointed oa_at the vari o~as points of the three pl ans_ He was concerned wi th the aesthetics of- Al ternat i ve and and f e1 t that A:1 tcrr~ati ve ~ provides far 1 arger 1 ots and`~more space between the hoa_ases_ Ha preferred No_ 1 ~ and pointed out that the prep osad private access road woa_al d el i mi Hate thr-ae driveways f rontir-aq F'"oothi l'1 Road_ F•etc=r S'hutts~ archi tect~ 8~~ F'et ers Avanue~ also repr esc.nt ed tl->e application _ He felt that Al ternati ve ~~ had some merit and b enef i is ~ bt_at felt that Al terriati ve `, woa_al d p~^eser>t a fragment ed s~-abdi vi•~i c>n_ Ha felt it would be difficult to work:: with Lot on Al ternat i ve 3 and thought i t would create unnecessary h ardsl->ips_ Ha tF-aougl--at Al tarnati va 2 might have bcstter- sl-aap ad lots thar> IVo_ v,_ He still felt the original proposal (Al t_arnati ve 1 ) woa_al d mi ni mi ~e the imp act on the vi ewsh ad and that i t i s the best plan _ Cort>n>i ssi an cr E+erger commented tt-aat an Alternative. ~, only or->e h ou sa would be seen from F-oott-~i 11 Road ~ wt-ai la two would be scan on Alternative 2. Mr _ Shutts thought that two houses would al so be seen on Al ternat i ve 3. Further discussion an sued. Chairman Michel ott.i as4~cd st of{~ for clarification regarding a buildable site for Lot ..:a on Al-t ernati v@ -~_ Commi ssi on er Mah ern f e1 t that a long narrow house wou:L d have to ba built on Lot 3 of Al tarnati ve v:_ Mr. Sh utts agreed with that comment: and further di scussad the matte=r _ Chairmar~ Mi chel ot.ti ached staff for clarification rag ardi ng the alignment of Foothi 1 l Road and the affect i t would haves an Alternative ~_ Mr_ Swi-Ft er.pl ai Had that the final design for the rail i qn ment of Foott-ai 1 1 Road wi 1 1 not be complete far sev oral mon ths_ Currently they era 1 oo4si ng at rai si ng the sot_tt hboa_and 1 ones i n order to mi ni mi a.e the retaining w~a :L 1 s_ Commi ssi on er Mahern wondered ab oa_at the pl ac ement of homes on Lots .~ and :3 f-aci ng Foathi:L1 Road_ Mr-_ Swift felt this woa_ald c=ra etc l a pr-i vac-y pr-obl em and t!->at tna t-aom eo wn ar-s wot_tl d then request: saundwalls., as a nearby homeowner has already done_ 7-he Comrcai ssi on agreed they did not favor ba_ai 1 di ng mo~--e Commi ssi on err Horan and Mr. Swift fa_ar Cher di sc uss ed the pl ac am ent of horctas on Lots .~ and :~_ Commi ssi on err Horan wonder ad how the app 1 i cars felt about the pr i var_-y issue for homers on Lots ~ and that rni ght face Foothi.l l Road_ ~~ Fage v.