PC 05/24/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ci--sai rman Mi c!-sel ott i a1 so discussed Condi ti on 7 wi tFs Mr _ Lew _ Mr _ Lew s a i d i t i s i d en t i c a l t o a r ec en t ap p t i s at i an ~ St at e Farm_ CFsai rman Ms cFSe2 otti suggested that staff review tt+i s c and i t i an an d f e l t sur e t Fs a app I i can t woo l d c oop er at e_ TFse_gub 1 3 c-t~eaa^ 3 rzg_~nras_o@eraed= Joe Cat l ats ars ~ property owner .i represented the app! i cati ors _ He d3 sculled tf--se mitigation measures ~ noting ttzat i mprovements are incremental portions of tFse i mprovements tFsat wi 1 1 be comp! eted by tFse P1D_ He said ttte projc=ct ar cl-si tact is preserat_ The freeway mon omen t s i g n i s ttro e on l y t Fsi n g n of approved a s yet _ He asked f or some q u i d an c e so t hey wool d k now what t h e Comm i ss i on d es i r es _ Mar k L a n c our t~ Y 644 S_ Ma i n P l az a .t Walnut Cr ee k, a l so represented tl--se application _ He sai d ttse p r o f ~c t h as r ec e i ved ap p r ova l of t h e Hac i en d a awn er s $u s i n e s Assoc i at i on _ Ha explained that the project is designed to be a Flame furnisFsing center wi tl's anchor tenants tFsat wool d be compat i 61 a wi ti--s a b usi Hess of tl--si s nature_ He f el t that si gnage i s very critical to tFsei r success as tt--sey are trot on a major i tit ersecti on of the city_ J amen He i 1 b r onn er ~ p r o f ec t arc M1 i t ec t, 1 644 S_ Mai n St r ea t, Wa 1 n ut Creek ~ p resented an extensive s.l i d e stsow i n 9 of t tse p r op osed p r o f ec t_ Mr _ He i t br on n er d i sc used t he p r o f ec t~ n of i n g ttz a t t h e c ur b c ut s are i n place ~ as are tFse uti 1 i ty f eeds_ He showed tFse color samples t o t h e Camm i ss i on _ Comm 3 ss i on er Horan e x p r e sled same c on c er n about t h e sc r een i n g for meci-uani cal equipment and discussed si gnage wi tl--s Mr _ He i l b r on n er _ CFsairman MicFselotti questioned Mr_ Lancourt about tFse !--some center ti-same and i is tenants _ Mr _ Lancaurt cxp2 ai ned ttsey 1--save no 1 eases as yet r Fsowever ~ tFSey anticipate that someone 1 i Y_e $r uenner s ~ Laz y $oy Sof a ~ etc _ woo l d oe eesp y t h e major p or t i on of the bui 3 di ng _ Other I-some-re2 atad businesses soul d be 3 i ke Ac e Har d war e _ Ct~ai rman Mi cl--se1 otti asked i f they had considered a restaurant use . Mr _ Lanc our t sai d t Frey h eve c on s i der ed i t an d to eve discussed i t wi tFs Haci anda Qwners Assn _ and tt~e City _ TY-sey wool d 1 i ke tFse f 1 er_ i b i 2 i 1 ty of Fsavi ng ei tFser a Flame-ref ated an c A ar t en an t or a r est our an t _ Cl--sa i t man M i c M1 e l of t i expressed c on c o r n about p ar k i n g p r ob l ems an d increased tr of f i c i f a restaurant were put i n rather tFsan a 4-a ome-related b u r i n ass . Page .~