PC 04/26/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Hov i ngh d i s cus s ed the design o f garage and a cce s s fo r 1 awn mowers ~ etc _ Mr _ Rob ins on exp 1 a fined that there i s a s ign i f i cant d rop from the street down a s the foundation i s raised s o acce s s i sn • t too important _ Mr _ Robinson stated that they have tried to e 1 im mate any s ituat i on where a resident wou 1 d t ry to do any gardening on s i to _ Commissioner Horan expressed concern with the east e 1 evat i on hav i ng no facade change proposed _ Mr _ Robinson explained what wool d be i nvo lved to change that facade and that once one thing i s changed i n an o l d hoes e such a s this ~ other th ings need to a l s o be changed i n a cha i n reaction _ Mr _ Robinson stated that shrubbery and tree s a re p l armed fo r the area and th i s shoo 1 d he 1 p the appearance o f the hoes e immense 1 y_ Discussion then ensued between the Commissioners re 1 at ing to the mate r i a 1 s o f the project _ Comm i s s i one r Horan commented that the two add i t i ona 1 un it s behind i t 1 oolc comp 1 ete 1 y d i f ferent _ Mr _ Rob i ns on then reviewed a 1 1 o f the 1 and s cap i ng p 1 armed fo r the project _ describing i n data i 1 the spec i e proposed _ _ Comm i s s i one r Hov ingh a s ked i f both resident s w i 1 1 have a cce s s to the new de clc _ Mr _ Robinson responded that the deck i s designed on 1 y fo r the hous e _ Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh s aid it wou 1 d p robab 1y make more s ens e from a p 1 ann i ng standpoint to have a deve 1 opment proposed f or both the property bah find the Robinson property to the east with the Robinson p roperty _ Mr _ Robinson s aid they have been working w i th Mr . Au f de r Maur ~ adjacent property owner ) regarding drainage and at th i s t ime ~ Mr _ Robinson i s not aware o f what Mr _ Au f de r Maur ha s p 1 armed for the s ite _ The pub l i c hearing wa s c l o s ed _ Cha i rma n M i the 1 ott i fe 1 t th i s p 1 an t o be an improvement ova r what wa s or fig ina 1 1 y approved for th i s property _ Comm i s s i one r Berger i s i n favor o f the proj act becaus e i t i s better tha n the o r fig ina 1 p 1 an _ Commissioner Horan wa s i n favor o f the propos a 1 but wished the app 1 i cant wou 1 d consider doing s ometh ing to the e a st s fide o f the Mouse _ A motion wa s made by Commissioner Berger ~ s ec onded by Comm i s s i one r Horan to recommend app rova 1 o f Case PUD- 8 5 - 1 6 - iM subject to the condition s o f the sta f f report _ - 1 2 -