Laserfiche WebLink
Comm i s s i one r Mahern , 1 i stened to the p roperty owner s comment s at <br />the l a s t meeting _ Commissioner Mahe rn deal s w i th the subj ect road <br />da i 1 y to connect to H ighway 8 4_ She f e l t the road w i 1 1 be used <br />more i n the future even i f the deve 1 opment do e s n • t occur _ S he <br />wou 1 d l ilce to s ee the road straightened and made s a P er bec au s e i t <br />w i 1 1 be u s ed more and more by the P1 ea s anion a nd Livermore <br />communities _ Trie add i t i ona 1 Know1 edge that tri e County w i 1 1 be <br />putting i n a road s oath o f Al 1 ec property mean s an i s 1 and ha s <br />a 1 ready been created _ Alternative No _ 1 i s p re £e rred bec au s e o £ <br />the s a£ ety i s sue s_ S he wou 1 d l ilce t o s ee V i n ey a rd Avenue cut -de - <br />s a c• d £ or acce s s t o E BRPD but i£ Mr _ Al 1 ec c ou 1 d be a c c ommodated <br />by c 1 o s i ng V i neya rd Avenue and having a cce s s t o th e east ~ she <br />wou 1 d a 1 so be in favor o £ that _ <br />Comm i s s i one r Hoyt s tated he pre £e rs A l ternat ive 1 o r 2 but wou 1 d <br />l ilce t o e l im i Hate the north/south a rea on V i neya rd Avenue , s oath <br />o£ the Al 1 ec property and st i 1 1 p rov i de a cce s s to E BRPD t o the <br />east _ Th i s wou 1 d p robab 1 y make the A 1 1 ec p rop e rty more a c ce s s i b 1 e <br />and wou 1 d be more de s i rab 1 e_ <br />Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh pre £ e rs A 1 t e rn at ive 1 s o th a t none o f the <br />Al 1 ec property i s touched by the road _ I t i s d e s i rab 1 e to Keep <br />the current V i neya rd Avenue a s i t i s, but h e h e a r s L i ndenmeye r• s <br />rea sons for having a 1 0 op road _ Concern i ng th e north/south spur <br />o£ the existing V ineya rd Avenue , i£ it i s 1 eft i n, i t wou 1 d 1 e ave <br />an opening for Al 1 ec shou 1 d he develop the north end o f h i s <br />property _ Commissioner Hov i ngh wou 1 d 1 i ace t o s e e a n othe r exit on <br />the Ha rr i s property t o the e a st t o run to the s pu r_ <br />Comm i s s i over Hoyt fe 1 t that Mr _ A 1 1 e c shoo i d g a i n s ome b ene f it and <br />d idn • t fee 1 th e spur shoo 1 d b e 1 eft _ <br />Chairman M i the 1 ott i d idn • t want to do anything t o cut o f f a cce s s <br />by the current a 1 ignment _ I f the C i ty go e s w i th Alternative 1 i t <br />appears i t wou 1 d be most 1 og i ca 1 for A 1 1 e c to a cce s s o f f the new <br />a 1 i gnment _ <br />Chairman M i the 1 ott i supported Alternative 1 a s the on l y v i ab l e <br />option and she support s a more rura 1 roadway _ <br />The pub l i c hearing wa s c l o s ed _ <br />A motion wa s made by Comm i s s i one r Hov i ngh ~ s a c and ed by <br />Commissioner Mahe rn to adopt the Negative Dec 1 a rat i on p ropo s ed fo r <br />Ca s e GP- 8 9- 1, a s project approva 1 wou 1 d have n o s ign i P i cant <br />adver s e e £ £ e ct on the environment _ <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES : Commissioners Hov i ngh , Hoyt , Mahe rn , a nd Chairman <br />M i the 1 ott i <br />NOES . N one <br />ABSENT . Comm i s s i on a r Berge r <br />ABSTA= N c None <br />- S - <br />