PC 02/08/89 - Laserfiche WebLink

UP-89-2y-.T otsrs_Sk egg ~/Cast 1 ewood-Prog@r t 3 es Applicati OA for a bl arsket corsditi or-sal use permit to allow the establ 3 shmerst of contractor 's storage yard/office as-id ware house uses at 73 Ray Street and determi r~ati on of compl i as-sce of the proposed use wit h the C-S t Service Commercial ) Z orsi rsg D i st r i c t_ Zorsi s-sg for the property is C-S tService Commercial ) Di strict_ Mr _ Swi f t presented the staf f report recommes-sdi s-sg that Case UP-89-2 b e approved sub j ec t t o t h e c on d i t i on s of t h e st a f f r ep or t _ The pub 1 i c hear i rig was opened _ Art Durekl ey ~ 239 Mai rs Street ~ Suite E ~ represer-et ed the app2 z cati as-e _ He spoke of the Skaggs bui 1 di rsg and the uses proposed f or i t_ He n of ed t hat t h e p r i mar y user i s i n t h e g lass t i rat 3 rig busi rs ess whi ch requires a very clears ei-ivi rorsmerst and f e l t t hat i t was sup er i or t o a muf f I er or p a i i-et shop wh i c h h e tl-`augl-Et was a permitted use_ He knew of no compl ai rsts by riei ghtrors i e-e the area _ Nancy Stover ~ 7G74 Wal rsut Dri ve.e stated that she had no c omp h i n t s at present , b ut was concerned t hat at some f ut ur e t i ma t hat i r-sc r eased t r of f i e an d p ass i b l e ac t i v i t y b y 6 am wool d be an is--evasion of homeowrsers' privacy_ She referred to a letter try Mr _ Dunk l ey sa y i ri g t hat t h e p r op osed use i s i d ea l f or t h e parti col ar property and di sagreed w3 th that. She was eor-ec ers-eed about wh o f ut ur e c on t r ac t or s m i gh t tr e. Sh a f e l t t h i s wa s n of a good 1 oc at i on f or i s-ed ustr i a l uses an d t hough t i t wool d t en d t o d eve l u~ t h e prop er t y i n t hat area _ Mr_ Durskley returned to the podium_ He said he sympathized with the previ ous speaker _ He f el t that earl y morrii i--ig not se wool d rsat !~ e a p r ob I em b ec ause t r uc k t r of f i e wool d b e r estr i s ted a h e t hough t t h e proposed u se acid f ut ur e c on t r ac t or s woo l d b e superior to those allowed in the CS aos-si r-ig_ The pub t i c hearing was c 1 osed _ Commi ssi or-eer Hovi s-egh asked Mr _ Swi f t i f a eoe-edi ti ors cool d tre added a l l ow i n g t h e rs ei gh b or s th a r i g h t t o p rotes t p ossi 6 1 e excessive rsoi sa_ Mr _ Swi f t sai d a coi"edi t i ors can be added and that a compl ai rsarst wool d leave to i rsst i gate a comp 1 ai rst agai s-tst the tenant ar-sd triers t tie use p er m i t woo I d b e r ev i awed _ Comm i ss i ae-ser Maher rs stated she symp at h i x ed w i t h Ms _ Stover ~ b ut f e l t t h e ap p l i c a t i ors was appropriate ~ asp ec i a l 1 y w i t h a c oe-sditi ors added regardirsg excessive ~r-ioise_ A mot i ors was made by Commi ssi oreer Berger ~ sec or-eded by Commi ssi orser Maherrs heat a2 1 required f i s-edi rags <as shovers 3 n the st a f f r ep or t) ar a made , app r ov i n g Case UP-84-2 sub j ec t t o t h e eoe--editi ores of the staff report ar-ed add$rsg Corsditi ors No_ 7 that Pag e 1 4