Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Mahern a eked i P the tree s to be removed cou l d be <br />r ep l anted e 1 s ewhere _ Mr _ Cooper wa s not sure , but thought the <br />sma 1 1 er s i z ed tree s cou 1d survive transp 1 ant i ng _ Ms _ K 1 i ne added <br />that norms 1 1y s i x i nch tree s can survive tr ansp 1 ant i ng _ <br />Discussion ensued between Commissioner Horan a nd Ms _ K 1 irle <br />regarding the us a o P sp i it 1 of s and retaining wa 1 1 s_ <br />Commissioner M i the 1 ott i stressed that Putur e buyer s shoo 1 d be <br />made ewer e o f a 1 1 grading restrictions through the CC S.R • s and any <br />other d i s c 1 osure s be Por a they purcha s e their 1 of s_ <br />Chairman Mahern expressed concern that a s the Y ee re s id enc e ca n <br />be s e en Prom a great d i stance that the proposed home s wou 1d a 1 s o <br />be very v i s i b l e _ Mr _ Cooper thought that Prom Footh i 1 1 Road and <br />the immediate area the house s wou 1d not be v i s ib 1 e ~ however , they <br />might be s e en f rom other points in the valley _ Height <br />1 im i tat i one a r e spec i P i c at th i s point _ <br />Commissioner McGU i rlc d i e cus s ed the matter o P po s s ib 1 e tr a P P i c <br />contro 1 i n r egard to the proposed s i t e w i th Mr _ Sw i£ t_ <br />Commissioner Wright noted that he ha s driven on the existing road <br />to the Yee house _ He asked iP that road Yeas been approved by the <br />Fire Marsha 1 1 _ He wa s concerned that the r o ad i s extreme 1y <br />narrow and ha z ardou s P or a car , much l e s s a f i r e tru clc _ <br />Mr _ Cooper i nd i sated the F ire Marsha 1 1 i s c omP orta b 1 e w ith the <br />road a s i t i s_ They are trying to avo i d cutting i nt o the h i 1 1, <br />which wou 1d need to be don e i P the road i s w i den ed _ <br />Marti n = nt erb it z en , 6 2 W_ Ne a 1 Street , P 1 ea s ant on , a l s o <br />represented the app 1 i cat i on _ He s tat ed that the Yee s , Mr _ Coop e r <br />and h ims e 1 P ba s i ca 1 1y agree w ith the coed i t i on s o P appr ova 1_ <br />However , he had m inor objection s to condition s 4 a nd 5 O regarding <br />the dad i cat i on o P open space _ He P e l t a s though the app 1 i cant <br />wa s being a s ]ced to p ay more than a P a i r share o P easement P e e s <br />£ or the pub t i c acs e s s P or us e o P the open space _ <br />Commissioner Hora n t o l d Mr _ = nterb i t z en condition 5 0 ha s nothing <br />to do w ith condition 4 _ He s aid condition S O i s s imp 1y to <br />provide P ire protection and the contr i but i on i s a pro -rat a share <br />o P the pr open i e s being deve 1 op ed a 1 ong Footh i 1 1 Road _ <br />Commissioner Hov i ngh a sKed Mr _ Sw i Pt i P one 4 -whee 1 drive i s <br />adequate _ Mr _ Sw i ft i nd i sated that i n a l l a ctua l ity more than <br />one i s needed _ <br />Mr _ S nt erb it z en addressed condition S 3 _ He thought i t wa s quit e <br />a d i stance P rom the proposed pro j ect t o Dub t i n Canyon Road , and <br />that when the PUD wa s approved , there wa s not sufficient need £ or <br />tra P P i c m it igat i on measures , a s i s now required o P We 1 1 s Fargo <br />MINUTES PI.AMMIMG COMISSIOM DECEMBER 72, 1990 PAGE 8 <br />