PC 11/28/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

the drawing. Commissioner McGuirk and Mr_ Callahan furt2-ier d i s cu s s ed the des ign and acce s s to the porches . Mr . Ca 1 1 aha n put up a co 1 ored r ender i ng f or d i sp 1 ay . Cha irman Mahern questioned Mr . Ca 1 1 ahan regarding th e p o s s i b i l i ty o £ i n sta 1 1 ing spa s and any regu 1 at i on s that m igrit be needed . Mr . Ca 1 1 aria n s aid s ome yard s ar e 1 ergs enough to a c c ommodat a spas ~ however ~ he c ou 1 d not ant i s ip at a p e op 1 e wanting one s i n c e ther e w i 1 1 be a c ommon on e provided _ Shou l d tho s e p e op l e w i th a 1 a rge enough yard want a spa ~ the CC S•R • s wou 1 d have sp e c i £ i c r egu 1 at i on s regarding noise ~ etc _ Commissioner Hov i ngh d i s cu s s ed w i tri Mr _ Swift a nd Mr _ C a 1 1 ah a n the i s sue o £ £ ire standards f or the garages _ Mr _ Sw i £ t n of ed that they must be i nsta 1 1 ed w i th one -hour £ i r e standard s a nd tria t the F ire D epartment must have c 1 e ar a cce s s to them _ Chairman Mahern questioned Mr _ Ca 1 1 aha n a bout the h e i ght o f th e townhouses . He exp 1 a i nad they wou 1 d be 3 8 • 6 •• above th e grade which mean s that th e s tructur e i s measured f r om the existing grad e t o th e h ighe s t p o i nt _ Chairman Mah ern a sK ad Mr . C a 1 1 arian f or c 1 ar i f i c at i on a s how entry into the house s w i 1 1 be a cc omp 1 i shed . Mr _ C a 1 1 arian went t o the drawing s and p o i nt ed that out t o h ar _ Chairman Mahern and Commissioner M i the 1 ott i d i s cu s s ed w i th Mr _ Ca 1 1 arian the tree report and h i s reaction t o i t. Mr _ Callahan d i s agr a ed w i th the tree report a nd thought that a lmo s t a l l the p er imeter tree s c ou l d be s aved _ He ha s worked with trees o£ this species before and has had considerable 1u c)c with bu i 1 d i ng a round them . H e stressed the t h e i nt and s t o s eve a s many tree s a s h e c an _ Commissioner Wright r e f err ed t o P age 7 o f th e s t a f f r ep ort and asked for clarification as to the width o£ alley ••one_ •• Mr_ Sw i £ t corrected the sta £ £ report . noting that a 1 1 ey •• one •• i s 1 6 ft_ , alley ••two•• is 20 ft. COMMENT S FROM THE AUD= ENC E Stan 1 ey Rathbon e ~ 3 2 5 Ray S tr e et ~ sp o3c e i n opposition to the project ~ s ay i ng he £ e 1 t i t wa s r i d i cu 1 ou s_ He tri ought tri er e we r e entirely t o o many house s f or th e l o c at i on and f e l t i t sri ou 1 d b e cut down t o one -ha 1 f He thought w i th a l l th e c ar s that s i z e project wou id generate that the road s i n the a r e a we r e n of equipped we 1 1 enough . He a l s o £ e 1 t the growth r a t a o f P 1 ea s ant on wa s going entire 1 y too f a s t_ S n a dd i t i on ~ h e s a i d ha h Bard a i i grit r a i l m i grit be in st a l l ed betwe e n S a c r ament o a nd Nile s Canyon and d id not tri i nlc enough room wa s being 1 e f t ne a r the proposed pro j ect to accommodate that _ PLANNS NG COMMS S S= ON M2NIIT E S NOVEMBER 2 8, 1 9 9 0 PAGE 8