Laserfiche WebLink
indicated that the Housing Consultant doe s Piave exp ert i s e i n <br />trio s e £ i e Ids _ <br />Commissioner McGU i r]c re £ erred to a 1 etter from S ant a F e P a c i f i c <br />Pipelir~e Partners_ Mr. Swift responded that staff Yeas triad to <br />addre s s the i s sue s a nil c one erns a l l we e]c . He a l s o p o i rated out <br />that the add i t i ono l c ored i t i ons handed out t on i grit ( sp e c i£ i c a 1 1y <br />Condition 5 2) addr e s s e s the concerns o f S ant a Fe Pa c i£ i c P ip e 1 i ne <br />Partners . The matter i s not a pr ob 1 em at th i s p o i rat _ <br />Commissioner McGU i rk a sked f or c l ar i f i c at i on o f C o rail i t i on No _ 1 <br />regarding the •• in- 1 aw•• units _ Mr _ Sw i ft explained that th i s <br />condition means trio s e unit s must on 1y be r ent ed ~ but not <br />ne ce s s ar i 1y to i n- 1 aws or other r e 1 at eve s ~ a rail cannot be s o 1 d _ <br />I t a l s o doe s not mean that •• Granny•• must be charged rent _ <br />Commissioner Wright wondered whether the report th a t i s t o be <br />done on l ow and mod e rat a i n c ome Mousing w i 1 1 a ddr e s s the r e rata l <br />or •• Granny •• units _ Mr _ Sw i f t s a i d they wou l d h eve t o be r ent ed <br />t o a qua 1 i f i ed 1 ow or moiler at e i nc ome hou s eho 1 d and tM i s wou 1 d be <br />st ipu 1 ated on th a deed and r egu 1 at ory agreement f or th e t e rm trio t <br />the C i ty a nil d eve 1 oper wou 1 d agree t o_ <br />THE PUBL = C HEAR S NG WA3 OPENED . <br />So e Ca 1 1 aria n, 5 6 7 4 S t over i dge Drive ~ Ca 1 1 aria n Properties <br />represented the app t i c at i on _ He commended s t a f f f or th e <br />axes 1 1 once o f a r ep ort that ha s undergone many change s i n the <br />1 a st 3 0 d ay s_ H e s a i d he concur s w i th a l l trio c and i t i on s, but <br />said ha Mad s ome c one ern s that he £ e 1 t m i gh t b e omissions . He <br />a sk ed f or c 1 a r i f i c at i on r ego rd i rag the S t axe 1 ey B ou l eve rd <br />alignment ~ sp e c i£ i ca l 1y the north s i de o f the pub t i c s erv i c e <br />easement between th e proposed cu 1 -d e - s a c and the S tan 1 ey <br />Bou 1 eve rd / De 1 Va 1 1 e i rat er s e ct i on _ Mr . Swi f t not ad that <br />Condition 5 0 i n the handout ton fight completely explain s th a t <br />situation _ <br />Mr _ Ca 1 1 aria n r e f err ed t o P age 9 o f th e s to f£ r epo rt and a n <br />agreement that h e M a d entered i rat o w i th th e Country Road s Home <br />Association i n r e ga rd t o grading _ TM e a gr e ement s t at e s that he <br />w i 1 1 pr ov fi d e a s oundwa 1 1 that i s e i grit f t_ P r om 1 ower aver ag e <br />grad e on the i t s i de _ He wondered whether he wa s g o i ng t o 1 im i t ed <br />t o a s i x f t. s oundwa 1 1_ Mr _ Sw e f t c 1 a r i F i ed th a t th e s oundwa 1 1 <br />would be eight £t. and that Coredltlon No_ 53 addresses this <br />matter _ Height wou 1 d be r e £ er enc ed f r om the project t ownhou s e <br />not the C ountry Road s townhouses _ Commission e r M i ch e 1 ott i <br />Further d i s cu s s ed the matter w i th Mr _ Sw i £ t and Mr _ Ca 1 1 ahan _ <br />Mr _ Ca 1 1 ahan r e £ erred to Page 1 1 re 1 at eve to and ergrou rid i ng PG ~ E <br />and t e 1 eph one 1 i n e s_ The st a f£ r ep ort i nil i s at ed that h e a nil <br />other property owner s i rt the are a wou 1 d c o op Brat e i n th e <br />PLANN2 NG COMM= S S= ON M= NUT E S NOVEMBER 2 8, 1 9 9 0 PAG E 6 <br />