PC 11/14/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

He s aid he ha s reviewed the cored it i ores and agrees with a 1 1 the conditions _ He added that he Yea s s eves l architect s with h im that can answer questions _ Commissioner Mi the 1 ott i a sked Mr _ Purce l l how he f eel s about the e 1 imi reef i on o £ one parking space to acquire more 1 andscap ing _ Mr _ Purce 1 1 s aid it wou 1d be n ice to have more parking space , but can agree t o go a 1 ong w ith the add it i one 1 1 andscap ing _ Mike Bannister , 2 4 1 O Camino Ramon , 1 andscape architect , exp 1 a i reed f or Commissioner Mi the 1 ott i that the parking space nearest to Owens Drive would be the most l og i ca l to e 1 3m mate _ S t shoo 1 d not create any re a 1 prob 1 em _ Mr _ Purce 1 1 re Perred to the rendering d i sp 1 eyed f or the Comm i s s i on a red noted that i t i s pretty a ccurate in the depiction o £ the 1 and s cap i ng _ S n re spore s e t o Mr _ Purcell • s comment about the 2 4 -hour s ign shown on the drawing , Commissioner Hora n pointed out to h im that s ign wou 1d not be there , a s agreed at the Design Review stage _ Mr _ Purce 1 1 agreed and noted that the rendering j u s t d id not re f 1 ect the change _ Mr _ Bannister pointed out that the 2 4 -hour s ign i s not shown on the £ i na 1 p 1 an _ Commissioner Horan wondered about the f ea s i b i 1 i ty o f porta b 1 e 1 a reds cap i ng , such a s i n tubs _ Mr _ Purce 1 1 responded they have been tried i n other s t at i on s , but they Piave encountered prob 1 ems i n that peop l e run i nt o them , and the tubs a l s o present drainage prob 1 ems _ Chairman Mahern inquired a s to the f'r ont door overhang _ Mr _ Purce 1 1 i red i Gated that the front door i s 1 ocated beneath a n overhang _ Commissioner M i the 1 oft i a sked whether the pylon s i gn ha s been reduced to a monument s ign _ Mr _ Purce 1 1 i red i Gated that it ha s been changed _ Commissioner Mi the 1 ott i further d i s Gus s ed the matter with Mr _ Sw i ft _ Mr _ Sw i ft indicated that the s ign package a s shown wa s s een by the Design Review Board ~ but the C i ty Counc i 1 appea 1 ed the design o f the shopping center ; there fore , the C i ty Counc i 1 wi 1 1 review the amendment s o£ the Code a s we 1 1 a s the design o£ the s t at i on and the u s e permit _ Chairman Mahern expressed concern about the no i s e from the carwa sh _ B i 1 1 Dobson , arch i tact , i red i Gated that re 1 at ive 1y new equipment i s being used s o an a cc eptab 1 e no i s e 1 eve 1 wi 1 1 exist _ Shou 1 d that not prove to be true , he £e 1 t m it igat i on measure s were ava i 1 ab 1 e such a s a wa 1 1; a p 1 a st i s sh i e 1 d to 1 ower the height ; or a mod i f i cat i on to the b 1 ower _ = n re spore s e to Chairman