Laserfiche WebLink
s a 1 f - s arva ga so 1 iaa s tat i oas with food mart ~ aad to amaad s ac t i oa <br />1 8 _ O 8 ( Da £ is i t ions) ~ aad 1 8 _ 4 4 ( Tab 1 e) to s at forth locat ioa <br />cr i tar is aad per formaace s taadard s for s arvica s tat ioa carwa sh <br />blowers _ <br />UP - 9 O - O 5 Chevron USA <br />App 1 i cat ioa for a toad i t ioaa 1 us a parmi t to operate a ga s <br />scat ioa ~ food mart ~ aad carwa sh at 5 2 8 O 8opyard Road _ 2 oa iag for <br />the property i s C -F ( commerc is 1 Freeway ) District _ <br />Mr _ Swi ft presented the s to f f report , and stated that both case s <br />shoo 1d be acted on together _ <br />Chairman Mahern suggested that the Mun i c ipa 1 Code amendment be <br />d i s cu s s ed f i r st _ <br />Commissioner Wright expressed concern about the s e 1 f -service <br />parking space def inition in regard to parK ing spaces _ He was <br />concerned there m i ght not be a parking area f or tho s e pe op l e who <br />want to use a phone or map-cYieck_ Mr_ Swift said that kind of <br />s top i s not a 1 ong-term s top , but that peop 1 e norma 1 1y j ust pu 1 1 <br />over to the s i de _ Commissioner wr fight s aid he i s not s o <br />concerned about th i s part i cu 1 ar app 1 i c at i on ~ but po s s i b 1y £ or <br />future s fife s _ Mr _ Sw i £ t further d i scus s ed th i s w ith Commissioner <br />wr fight , noting that any future s i to s can be 1 ooked at on a case - <br />by - ca s e basis _ <br />Cha i rmari Mahern a sked i f stn f f ha s any idea how many s i to s ar e <br />s t i 1 1 ava i 1 ab 1 e i n the C ity f or s ervi ce stations _ Mr _ Swi f t s a i d <br />that wou 1 d be hard to s ay ~ he named s evera 1 area s i n the C i ty <br />that cou 1 d accommodate a s erv i ce s to t i on a 1 ong w i th a shopping <br />center _ He s a i d there wou 1d no doubt be more s ervi ce station s <br />that would c ome into the C i ty , but wou l d be on the busier <br />streets _ <br />Chairman Mahern pointed out that the Ord i Hance change wou l d a l s o <br />apply to other futur e s erv i ce stations , not j ust the d i s cu s s ed <br />one _ Mr _ Sw i ft a l s o noted that what w i 1 1 probably happen i s that <br />therLe w i 1 1 be continua 1 change s i n the existing s erv i ce station s <br />1I1 1. OWI1 _ <br />C omm i s s i oner Mi the 1 ott i p o i nt ed out that another f actor in regard <br />t o parking concerns i s that many s erv i c e stations are moving away <br />£rom any k i nd o f heavy duty me char i ca 1 repa i r work _ <br />Commissioner Hov ingh re f erred to Page 6 and the de f in it i on o f <br />•• S erv i ce Station , Fu 1 1 S ervi ce _ •• He f e 1t that the de f i n i t i on <br />shoo 1 d include that a Fu 1 1 S erv i ce station shoo 1d s ay that i t <br />i nc hide s a bay or bays , otherw i s e m inor repair s m i ght be done i n <br />the open _ He agreed w ith Commissioner Wright a s to the parking <br />at a s e l f- s erv i c e station _ He thought that i t shoo 1d be <br />1 eg i s 1 at ed that there be at 1 ea s t one parking space £ or each <br />4 <br />