PC 10/10/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

S ~ S Prop ert i e s ( We stbrooK) ~ Laguna Oak s Spec i£ i c P 1 an Mod i £ i cat i on ~ and PUD - 8 9 - 5 - 1M ~ be coat inued to October 2 4 _ The Board agreed to the s e changes _ MATTERS SNST SATED BY COMMS S S S ON MEMBERS 1 _ Comm i s s i ox-~er Hov i ngh s aid he recently went to a home owner s association meeting at H igh 1 and Oaks _ Ther e i s a s oundwa 1 1 going up on Footh i 1 1 Road _ There i s s ome concern that home owner association s igns that were on the wa 1 1 near the entrance o £ the tract on H igh 1 and Oaks Drive have been removed _ The home owner s wou l d 1 ilLe the s e s igns rep 1 aced ~ i f po s s i b 1 e_ The s econd concern i s that s ign s announcing a ct iv it i e s w ith i n the H i gh l and Oaks are a have been r emoved by Joe DeTata _ Commissioner Hov ingh under stood why they were p i cKed up but wondered i f sta £ £ c ou 1d checK on th i s and s ee i £ ther e i s s ome way that act iv i t i e s c ou 1d be announced • such a s on a K i o sK _ Mr _ Sw i f t s a i d h e wou 1 d check i nt o the matter _ Commissioner Hov i ngh s a i d the neighborhood wou 1d a 1 s o 1 iKe s ome Kind o f ident i P i c at i on s i gn on the s oundwa 1 1 noting that the area i s c a 1 1 ed H igh 1 and Oaks _ Mr _ H i gdon s a id he wou 1 d 1 0 oK at the p 1 an s and report back to the C omm i s s i on _ 2_ Commissioner M i the 1 ott i commented on a s oundwa 1 1 at O aK H i 1 1_ She s aid the C i ty Counc i 1 had s aid the present wa 1 1 wou 1 d be met with a s oundwa 1 1 that i s t o be insta 1 1 ed ~ but i t wou 1 d not exceed the he i ght o f the present one _ what sh e wou 1 d not want i s f or one wa 1 1 or f ence t o be h i gher than the adjoining one _ She requested sta £ £ t o check on the matter _ Mr _ H i gdon agreed t o the cK i nto the i s sue _ 3_ C omm i s s i over McGU i rK commented about a s oundwa 1 1 at Mu i rwo od North _ He wondered i £ it i s the p 1 an to have the new wa 1 1 abut i nt o the p i 1 1 ar s_ Mr _ Sw i f t exp t a i ned they a r e trying t o work with e a ch property owner on th i s matter _ 4_ Commission er McGU i rK commented about a worKSYiop d i s cu s s i on o f the Mo11er development _ He wondered if there was going to be a £ our -way i nt er s ect i on w i th a s top 1 fight at Fo oth i 1 1 a nd Mu i rwood North _ Mr _ Sw i f t there are p l an s f or a s top i fight a t Mu i rwo od North ~ the contract ha s been 1 et ~ but nothing h a s been constructed a s yet _ The p l an would be that whatever happen s on the Mo 1 1 er property t o try t o 1 i nK whatever street i s i n the i t property t o the t s ame i nt er s e ct i on s o ther e w i 1 1 be a f our -way intersection _ 5 _ Commissioner McGU i rK a slced whether the r o ad a 1 ong the Pa nCa 1 property i s being de 1 eyed unt i 1 the decision i s made a s t o how the project w i 1 1 progress _ Mr _ Sw i ft s a i d that road i s going to be bu i 1 t i n c on j unct i on w ith their pro j ect and goe s a c ro s s the S cha f er • s property a s we 1 1_ -2-