PC 09/26/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

the recommended property that the developer m i ght be at a disadvantage from the owner o f the shopping c enter _ Mr _ Sw i f t d i d not f ee l that would be a problem due to the advisory nature o£ the r ague st ( i t i s not a c and i t i on ) and gave s ome h i s tory o f the shopping center _ Mr _ Ca 1 1 aha n Yea s contacted the shopping center , but to date Zia s not been a b 1 e to work out a dea 1 _ Commissioner Horan a sKed the moderate i nc ome ca 1 cu 1 at i on o £ P l ea s ant on _ Mr _ Sw i f t noted that s eve ra l years ago they h a d a cce s s to a Tr i -Va 1 1 ey media n i ncome £ i pure , but s t a f f wa s not really c omf ortab l e wi th i t_ Unt i t the census i n f ormat i on i s ava i 1 ab 1 e , there i s no good in £ ormat i on c oncern i ng the media n income of Pleasanton. St is obviously higher than the Alameda County f i gure o f about $ 4 4, 0 0 0, maK ing P 1 ea s ant on a bout $ 5 2 0 0 0, based on the poor relationships used for the ••Tri-Valley median_ •• THE PUBL = C HEARS NG i7AS OPENED . So e Ca 1 1 ahan , o£ Ca 1 1 aha n Property Company , 5 6 7 4 S t one r i dge Drive , P 1 e a s anton , r epr e s ant ed the app 1 i cat i on _ He presented a number o £ rendering s a nd pointed out the are a they a re trying t o buy from the shopping c enter _ He i nd i Gated the c enter d o e s not Keep the d i s cu s s ed a rea very neat and that the i t trans £ orme r s a r e on Mr . Ca 1 1 ahan • s property _ He i nd i c at ed he wou 1 d c ont i nue t o try and worK out a f avor a b l e s o t ut i on _ Mr _ Ca 1 1 aha n s a i d he re a l l y had no c omment t o make o n the s to f f report , other tha n C and i t i on 8 regarding th e number o£ mod e r at e income units _ He wa s hope fu 1 that the C i ty wou 1 d a ccept 1 O $ ( or 2) o f the unit s a s modera t o i nc ome unit s r athe r th an 2 0$_ He noted tl-iere are no townlzomes like the ones Yie is proposing at th i s t ime , a nd he £ e 1 t they ar e providing decent s i z ed un i t s_ I f he i s 1 im i t ed t o the 2 0~, h e s a i d i t i s n of e c onom i c a 1 1 y £ e a s i b 1 e to do the project a s p 1 a nn ed _ He s a i d i f the 1 0$ i s approved , he wou id a sK appr ova 1 to rev i s e the p 1 an a s Mr _ Sw i f t had explained ear 1 i er t o ga i n two extr a units _ He s aid they have spent a 1 of o f t ime w i th the neighborhood and wou i d not 1 i Ke t o have t o cha nge the p l an t oo much _ Comm i s s i over McGU i rK a slce d Mr _ Ca 1 1 ahan t o c 1 ar i fy wha t he i s trying t o do w i th the c one apt o f a dd i ng the two add i t i on a 1 units _ Mr _ Ca 1 1 ah a n showed th e Commission o n the renderings wha t h i s p l a n wou 1 d be _ He exp t a i ned the unit s wou 1 d f i t i n th e s ame enve 1 ope o f 1 and w i th th e garage s being n a rr ower _ Commissioner M i the 1 ott i a sKed how th e new p l an wou l d a f f e c t th e pr i c e o f the other £ our units . Mr _ Ca 1 1 aha n s a i d th e other unit s wou 1 d have t o go up i n pr i c e a 1 i tt 1 e b i t t o o f f s et the mod e r at e MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION SepYert~ber 26, '1990 Page 4