PC 09/22/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Elr er-at Wilco>: , for C~ec~r g2 and Marylou Wilco:: who reside at 3988 S't and ey foul ever-d , said tl-aey 1 i ve Haar tt~e corner of the proposed pro jest Ha said they have dealt wi th traffic on Stanley Soul evard for many years, and have come to respect -the judgment of st off and Commi ssi on i n the past reg ardi ng traf f i c issues_ However, he and his parents are still concerned about the traffic on Stanley. He said the triangle area has been the problem : p a r t i c u l a r l y, a t L i m a s l i Fx e s '7 a_ m_ , 8 a_ m_ and a g a i r~ i ra the eveni rig. He felt this mi ght be i r~cr eased bee aa_ase of the pr-ob ab i 1 i ty of two wage earners who would be driving . He real i :~. ed that the traffic i ss~aas woa_al d be addressed at a 1 at er d ata_ Ha as4zed Mr _ Swift whether there would be any vi abl e proposal. for the change of Boni ng that would not envi si on new street access onto the section of 5't and ey and First Street_ 1"Ir _ Swift sai G they cot-al d 1 ooF:: into tt-~e matter and would chec4: i nta the overal 1 PUD and tl-aen get bacFc wi th Mr _ Wi 1 co>: _ Mr _ Wi 1 co>: commented that his concern i s not just for he and hi s parents, but for the er~ti re Hai ghbor-hood. Additional concerns ware. He did not want three driveways in a rows he was concerned about a 1 of t turn on Stand ey i n the di r-action of I-68C>q and was concarraed ab oa_at the concantr ati on of traffic goir~g to First Street at certain hours_ Ha concluded that he felt confident st of it wot-.al d tr-y to wor F:: out al 1 the i ssa_aes a and he had no opposition to the aor~i ng ch an ge_ Steve F2ennel s , 269 F:ac heel F 1 ace., 1 i ves two houses from the proposed projc=ct. He was concerned about increased traffic in the area bee aa_ase of the prof act. He was also very concerned that a street wo~al d be i mmed i atal y ad j ac ant to his house and that an access road might create a collector type of probl em_ Earl Augusta, co-owner of the prop arty being discussed, r asp onded to 1"Ir . St C-1 air and Mr Fiennel s_ hie stated that when their respective Homes were bui 1 t , that the project imp acted hi s life styl a, ba_at that he did rant complain. In re9 and to cone erns about i r~craased traffic , he did not thi nF: that would be a problem, ba_at that with traffic mitigation meas~ar es that have t a4_ar-~ p 1 ace., that tr of f i c on Stan 1 ey Soul evard i s not as bad as i ra the past _ He said Yte supports the project as presented _ Commissioner Wiichel otti asF~ed Mr_ Callahan about the trees on St and ey_ Mr. G'allah an said the bl ac4c walnut trees on the west and east and of the property are not i n good heal th g however , they will attempt to save all they possibly can. Hpparently, F•G$eE has pruned these trans heavily and the horti cul turf st for the project indicat ad they may be per man eritly damaged_ M~.ICh wi 1 1 depend on how the Stan 1 ey Soul evard right-of -way i s treated. Mr . Swift commented that era al i gnrnent study i s being dons for St and ey Soul evard and a report woa_ald be forthcoming to the Commi ssi on . MINUTES F•LANN I NfV COMM I SS I [7N August 22 , 1990 F•age 14