PC 08/27/1990 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commi ssi oner Mi c_hel ott i thot_aght the fact that the hot_ase on gi na'1 l y went over the proposed 45% FAr-i c-rested a house on a 1 of that s l o p e s down . She felt that M r_ S c h n e i der was c o r r e c t i n s a y i n g t hat t here have been p r o b l e m z_ She z a i d she w a s present when this PUD was approved and felt a m i s t a Ece had bee n made i rt not seeing what grading was t a F~ i n g place _ However , s h e felt that i f- everything o n the plan i s i n conformance and i f i t i sn ' t a regC.ei rem~nt that i t go bae4e before Design Revi aw, she f e 1. t she could not support the appeal and would have t o deny :i t . Commi s z i on er M a h e r n said s h a b a s i c a l l y agreed w i t h Commi s c i o n er Michel o t t i s comments _ When t h e PUD modification came u p l a zt O c= t u b e r, she had voted i n denial o f t h e modification , not so much because of restricting -the views from this house, but more in terms of having con=_si st envy of the fencing. Commi ssi on e r H ov i n g h agreed w i t tt Co rttm i s z i on er M a h e r n comments _ A moti ors was made= by G'ommi ssi on er- Mah errs , seconded by Commi ssi on er Hovi ngh denyi r~q G'ase AF'-9V-Ct9 thus upholding st of f ~ dec i si on and ap pr-owi ng the house. F20L=.~ --_ C A L L-----_V O T E AVE_Se Commi ssi or-ters Horan ., Hovi r~gh , Mattern , Mi ctte:L ott:i , and Chai rmari Berger Nt~ES a None AFjSEN'r"= Nona FANS"TA I N e Nona FLesol~ati on No_ PC-9C>-61 was entered and adopted der~yi ng Gase AF-'-9c i--<~9 as motioned .. PUD_-80 =1:~-=,D=2M ~- P1 ~a~~rit Vi 1_1 ao~ Assoc3 ~t ~s~. App t i c at i on o f P 1 ea:ant V i 1 1 ag a Associates f or a major mod i f i c at i On t o an approved r eta 3 1 commercial comp 1 ex t o r e l o c at a an electrical room and trash en c 1 osa_ar e, modify a fountain , extend a covered arcade and storefront w i n d owe t o t h e west building e 1 ev at i on , and t o amend the approved c omp r eh en s i ve signing program t o allow two i d en t i f i c at 3 on signs f or the t en an t space 1 oc at ed at the wester 1 y end of the b u i 1 ding t o tae 1 oc at ed at 6?r?Ca Santa Rita Road. Zoning for ttae property is PUD C P 1 an n e d Unit Deve 1 op men t> - Commercial D i strict _ Mr _ I s e r s o n p r e s e n t s ci the staff report r e c o mmen d i rt g approval o f PUD-84-1vr-~D-2M sub~eet to tl'l ~> conditions of the= zt aff rep ort_ Commi ssi on er Mahern noted that a person i n the aa_adi en c-e i s opposi ng the 29 f t. roof hei ght . Site wondered i f i t was i n the o r i g i n a l p l a n that a t i n g l e story b u i l d i n g b e that h i g h. Wir. Iser sores responded that it is only a portion of the roof that goes to .='9 ft_ most of the bt_aildi ng is "?1 Y/'.~"' ft. Fie said -the L-t w i l d i n g p l a n s are c on s i s t e n t w i tl'~ those originally approved _ MINUTE S P L A NN I N(3 C UM M I S S I O N June ~ 7, 1 9 9 0 Page 7