Laserfiche WebLink
A motion was made by Commi ssi oner 1'~ti chel ott i , seconded by <br />Commi ssi oner Hovi ngl-> f i. nd:i ng that the develop menu p1 an for Case <br />F'UD-E3~>-16--=M conforms to tt~e purposes; of tt->e F'UD ordir->ar~ces: <br />r-ac ommendi ng approval of L'~asa PUD-E3 C:-16-3M to modify tl--aa <br />Si gn at ure Center F'UD dt=vel op ment plan wi. ih the conditions 1 i st ed <br />i.n E>chi bit A: and recommending approval of Case PUD-8C>-16-._iD, <br />F°UU--84-16-6D, and PUD-8V--16-7D with the condi.ti ons of approval <br />as listed in Exl-ai bi is A, B, C, and D, wi tl-> tF>e -f ollowir~g <br />modif icati or>ao <br />Y _ Del ete the v , C>60 square foot 1 i mi t for the restaurant <br />on Parcel C: <br />.~ _ Ir~cl Cade 1 an gunge to say that retai 1 strip cer~ter i s not <br />encouraged <br />3_ That the restaurant pad not be so large as to prohibit <br />a si nyl e tenant retai 1 aasar i f that i s the dasi. red use: <br />4_ F't_at Cored i.ti ons ia?a, one and two on hold until the time <br />a ~traf-f i c study rni ght be needed ~ <br />5_ That the applicant, staff, Dublin/S<in Ramon Ser vi c_~es <br />Di str i. ct and area resi dents cooper-ate i n r-avi ewi ng <br />identification of the hazards, and notification of all <br />~f utt_a r-e tenants and residents as to the sl Cadge i ssue_ <br />6 _ 7"hat each of the bui 1 di. ngs on the si tes that ar-e not <br />shown as deve7. op ad at this point would come back: to <br />Dc si. gn Review Board and F'1 anni ng Commi ssi ons _ <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES= Con>mi ssi on er~s Horan , Hovi nyt> , Mat>ern , Michel ot~ti , <br />and Chai rman Berger <br />NOES a Nona <br />ABSENT: IVOne <br />ABS'-TA I N c None <br />Resol uti on No_ PG-9C>--69 was ant er ed and adopted r-ec ommendi ng <br />approval of Gases PUD-80--16--.:M, PUD-80---ib-.cD, F'UD-8C>-16-6D, and <br />PUD--8 C>- 1 6--7D as motion ed _ <br />M I NUTE.S <br />r-"L_ANN I NG COMMISSION <br />Junes 27, 199[> <br />f-'"age .^~-'7 <br />