Laserfiche WebLink
assessment , she felt that Parcel .= wo~al d have to be el i mi Wert ad <br />and the iSr_s f t _ setback: be i mpl emarited _ She supported 1 ooF:i ng <br />i nto a realignment of F-ooth i 1 1 Road , but real 1 y did not favor a <br />frontage ra~ad_ In concla_asi ors, she felt the F=oott~ill Corridor- <br />St~.rdy standards need to be hon or'ed , or there wi 1 '1 al ways be a <br />number of ex captions which would def eat the pa_arposa of the <br />st andards_ <br />Commi ssi on er Maharn echoed these comments_ She sa3 d she wort-red <br />on the sta_ady and felt it was commendabl e_ She said she could <br />not sa_apport anything wi thin 1 vC> f t _ of F=oothi 1 1 Road _ She sai d <br />the F=oothi 11 standards were applied to A-M Homes ja_ast two waaF~s <br />ago_ Stae did favor soma manner of eliminating dri vc ways off <br />F=oothill but did not want a road parallel to F=oothill_ She <br />apc~l o9ized to the applicant for- his not 1-ravir~G seen soma of the <br />conditions before torsi ght: however, she could not support= the <br />projac-G _ <br />Commi ssi on er Hovi ngh st at ad he al so could not support -tl .a <br />pro~ect_ He added that he feared the noise level from Foothill <br />mi c~ht sortaed ay be on er ous_ <br />Commi ssi on er Mc Ga..ai r{.-. stated he general 1 y coa..~l d not sa.-apport the <br />pr-o~ect and felt the 1=oothi 1 1 gt_ti del i Wes sh oul d be honored _ <br />Cheri rman ESerger- agreed that she f e1 t the F=oothi 1 1 gui del i Wes <br />sh oa_.al d be hon or ad and that they had al so appl i ad to A-M Homes_ <br />For that reason she could not support the project_ <br />Comrni ssi on err Horan wi shed tc~ inform the audi once that t-_hc-z <br />F oothi 11 G'orr:i dor' S't Tidy was not something i ni ti at acJ by -the <br />Commi s~=.i awn, but had bees initiated by public deli ra_ <br />A motion was made by Commi ssi over Hovi ngh , seconded by <br />Commi ssi on err Mah ern rec ommanding dani al of Gasa PUD--89-19 for <br />the reasons st at ed_ <br />FYOLL _-CALL_ VOTE <br />AYES: Commi ssi oraars Horan , Hovi ngh , Mah ern , and <br />Michel ott i ., anG Cheri rman Esergar <br />NOES a None <br />ASSENT: None <br />ABS'TA I N n Nona <br />Fiesol uti vn No_ PC--9C~--64 was entered and adopted roc ommendi ng <br />denial of Case F'UD-89-- 1 9 as mot i on ad . <br />MINUTES <br />F 1_ANIV I NG COMMISSION <br />June ^c7, 1990 <br />F'aga 19 <br />