My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/13/1990
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1990
>
PC 02/13/1990
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2013 11:46:25 AM
Creation date
10/5/2006 2:05:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/13/1990
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/20/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Wednesdays beginning F ebru a ry 2 8 1 9 9 0_ ( Unt i 1 B oar d o f <br />Ad j u s tme nt ord i Want e changed , B o and o f Adjustments ^ 7 O O pm , <br />P 1 ann i ng Commission . 7 3 0 pm ) <br />CONSEL3SIIS OF OP=NION. <br />1_ Da s i gn r ev i ew w i 1 1 c ont i nu e t o r ev i ew project s a s p e r <br />or d i Wan c e e stab 1 i sh ed by the C oun c i l <br />2 _ Fo r i s sue s which re 1 at e to ch ang e i n z on i ng , density , or <br />major p 1 ann i ng i s sue s, p r o j e ct may b e s e nt o n t o P 1 a nn i ng <br />Commission f or c o n s i d e ration prior t o r ev i ew o f sp e c i f i c <br />design _ <br />3 _ PUD's will continue to be reviewed at Design Review Board <br />firs t w i th r e comet endat i on s o f d e s i gn c2iang e i f necessary _ <br />Hopefully, this will make the Planning Commission's task <br />easier in reviewing the project (Design Review has taKen the <br />charter to recommend project design change where appropriate, <br />r ache r th a n r y a ct t o, approve , or d i s appr ove a sp e c i f i s <br />design i_ e_ Kott i nger , W e 1 1 s F ar go ) <br />4_ S i ng 1 e f am i 1y h ou s e s w i 1 1 c o rit inu e t o be r ev i ewe d, h op i n g t o <br />e stab 1 i sYi positive suggestion s th e app 1 i c a nt w i 1 1 u s a_ <br />Objective s w i 1 1 i n c 1ud e c on s i l t ency o f design o n a l l s i d e s o f <br />tTi e r a s i d en c a and i n r e l a t i o n t o surrounding p r op art i e s_ <br />5_ La nd s c ap e p l a n s e r a becoming mor e c omp f e t e a nd a d e qu e t a s i n c e <br />the •• pro f e s s i on a 1 s^ came o n b o a r d_ <br />6_ Regarding the F o oth i 1 1 Road C o rr i dor , th e j o i nt board s <br />reviewed and r each ed a c on c a nsus o n th e P 1 ann ing C omm fi s s i o n <br />subcommittee ' s draft s et o f guide 1 i n e s_ The subc omm i tt e a <br />(Mahe rn and B erg e r) w i 1 1 f urthe r r ~v i ew the s e guideline s a nd <br />a f i n a l dr a f t w i 1 1 f o 1 1 ow _ A 1 1 a r e c on s i s t e nt w i th th e <br />pr e s e nt Genera 1 P 1 a n_ <br />7_ Th e meeting date s w i 1 1 be ch a ng ed s o th at s ch edu l e d pub l i t <br />hearings will begin ON TSME_ <br />8_ Even w i th th e addition o£ th e d ~ s i gn review pr o c ~ s s <br />(i n c 1 ud i ng work s hop s e s s i on s) p r i o r t o P 1 ann i ng C omm fi s s i o n <br />hearings , P l e a s ant o n p r o c e s s e s app t i c at i o n s mor e qu i c3c 1y tY~a n <br />mo s t c i t i e s_ Project s r equ it i ng both P 1 ann i ng C omm fi s s i o n and <br />City C oun c i f r ev i ew ar e w i th i n the a cc apt a b l e t im e f r ame s_ <br />9_ Th e pr o ca s s i s worK i n g an d the r e su 1 t s shoo 1 d b e evident ov e r <br />th e n ext s ever a 1 months _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.