Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 92-93 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION DEFINING THE PROCESS FOR COUNCIL <br />CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS WHICH ~AVE <br />HAD SIGNIFICANT MODIFICATIONS PROPOSED AFTER <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTONRESOLVES <br />AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1: <br /> <br /> The City Council policy for processing projects which <br />have a significant modification which has not been <br />reviewed by the recommending body or bodies shall be as <br />follows: Prior to the City Council's taking action to <br />introduce an ordinance or otherwise approving a modified <br />project: <br /> <br />For a developer proposed modification, the modified <br />project shall be referred to the reviewing and <br />recommending body or bodies which have not reviewed <br />the modification and which are required by the <br />City's procedures to provide input and make a <br />recommendation as to such project. <br /> <br />For a City Council initiated modification, the City <br />Council shall refer the modified project to the <br />reviewing body or bodies which have not reviewed <br />the modification and which are required by City <br />procedures to provide input and make a <br />recommendation as to such project. <br /> <br />Section 2: This resolution shall become effective immediately upon <br /> its passage and adoption. <br /> <br /> I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING WAS DULY AND <br />REGULARLY ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OFT HE CITY OF PLEASANTON, AT <br />A MEETING HELD ON MAY 5, 1992, BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: <br /> <br />Councilmembers - Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver, and <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />Michael H. Roush, City Attorney <br /> <br /> <br />