My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 1815A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
1801 - 1900
>
ORD 1815A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/30/2023 4:24:07 PM
Creation date
9/27/2006 9:35:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 1815A
Tags
Ordinance
Description:
Ordinance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(b) In the event of a material breach of this Agreement, and failure to cure <br />pursuant to Section 5.1, by Property Owner at any time after the Effective Date, the City may <br />terminate this Agreement, subject to the provisions of this Article 5, by sending a Notice of <br />Intent to Terminate to the Property Owner setting forth the basis for the termination. The <br />Agreement will be considered tenninated effective upon receipt of a Notice of Termination. The <br />Property Owner may take legal action available at law or in equity, if it believes the City's <br />decision to terminate was not legally supportable. <br /> <br />5.5 Lel!al Actions. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 638, et seq., all legal <br />actions shall be heard by a referee who shall be a retired judge from either the Alameda County <br />Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal, the United States District Court or the United <br />States Court of Appeals, provided that the selected referee shall have experience in resolving <br />land use and real property disputes. Property Owner and City shall agree upon a single referee <br />who shall then try all issues, whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon <br />and issue all legal and equitable relief appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy <br />before such referee. If Property Owner and City are unable to agree on a referee within ten days <br />of a written request to do so by either party hereto, either party may seek to have one appointed <br />pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure Section 640. The cost of such proceeding shall initially be <br />borne equally by the parties. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section 5.5 shall be <br />considered a temporary judge appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California <br />Constitution. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 5.5, either party shall be entitled to <br />seek declaratory and injunctive relief in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce the terms <br />of this Agreement, or to enjoin the other party from an asserted breach thereof, pending the <br />selection of a referee as provided in this Section 5.5, on a showing that the moving party would <br />otherwise suffer irreparable harm. <br /> <br />5.6 Resolution of Disoutes Rel!ardimz Application of Existimz Standards or RelZarding <br />Compliance with the Master Map/BuildinlZ Permit Schedule, The parties recognize that disputes <br />may arise from time to time regarding the application of Existing Standards to the development <br />of the Project and/or regarding matters arising in connection with the Master Map/Building <br />Permit Schedule. Therefore, in addition, and not by way of limitation, to all other remedies <br />available to the parties under the terms of this Agreement, the parties wish to establish a dispute <br />resolution procedure that is designed to expedite the resolution of disputes relating to the <br />application of Existing Standards to the Project and/or regarding a matter arising in connection <br />with the Master MaplBuilding Permit Schedule, If, from time to time, a dispute arises between <br />the parties, e,g., a dispute in the field regarding the application or interpretation of one or more <br />Existing Standards a matter arising in connection with the Master Map/Building Permit <br />Schedule, the dispute shall initially be presented to the Planning or Public Works Director, <br />whichever is appropriate, for resolution. If the Planning/Public Works Director decides the <br />dispute to the satisfaction of Property Owner, the PlanninglPublic Works Director's decision <br />shall be deemed to have resolved the matter. If the PlanninglPublic Works Director cannot <br />resolve the dispute to the Property Owner's satisfaction, the dispute shall next be considered by <br />the City Manager, If the City Manager decides the dispute to the satisfaction of Property Owner, <br />the City Manager's decision shall be deemed to have resolved the matter, If the City Manager <br />cannot resolve the dispute to the Property Owner's satisfaction, the dispute shall next be <br />considered by a subcommittee comprised of two members of the City Council appointed by the <br />Mayor (the "Council Subcommittee"). One of the appointees may include the Mayor. If the <br /> <br />35690/849375v14 <br /> <br />-25 - <br /> <br />08125100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.