My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
SR 06:182
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2006
>
SR 06:182
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2006 4:49:46 PM
Creation date
9/14/2006 4:55:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/3/2006
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
SR 06:182
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ponderosa Homes - Lehman/Selway Property - Environmental Checklist <br /> <br />development, including public street areas - 1.44 dwelling units per acre based on 50 existing <br />and unbuilt homes approved under PUD-83-1O and PUD-83-12. <br /> <br />10. MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> <br />Environmental Setting <br /> <br />The subject site has not been identified to have mineral resource deposits. <br /> <br />Standards of Significance <br /> <br />For purposes of this environmental document, an impact is considered significant if the proposed project <br />would: <br /> <br />. Result in the depletion of a mineral resource. <br /> <br />Issues <br /> <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />With Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br /> <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br /> <br />No <br />Impact <br /> <br />Mineral Resources <br />Would the project: <br /> <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral <br />resource that would be of value to the region and the <br />residents of the state? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important <br />mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local <br />general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />D <br /> <br />[R] <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />a-b) The proposed project site is not included or delineated as a Mineral Resource Zone. Mining has <br />not occurred on the project site, and implementation of the project would not affect the availabil- <br />ity of any mineral resource. Therefore, this would be categorized as no-impact. <br /> <br />7. NOISE <br /> <br />Environmental Setting <br /> <br />External noise sources that could affect the site include airport noise from the Livermore Airport and <br />traffic noise from adjacent streets. Noise emanating from the site includes construction related noise <br />from site grading and building construction. <br /> <br />PUD-50 and PTR-5572 <br /> <br />Page 24 of 36 <br /> <br />June 7, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.