SR 06:210 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT In response to Commissioner Olson's inquiring regarding whether the balcony was planned to be off of the master bedroom, Ms, Mendez said that it was, Chairperson Arkin moved to deny Case P AP-97, thereby upholding the Zoning Administrator's approval of Case PADR-1542, subject to the Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staff. Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. Commissioner Fox proposed an amendment that the balcony be replaced by a standard window, Chairperson Arkin stated that the balcony is very small and appears to be more of an architectural piece than anything else, Commissioner Olson noted that the Fire Department would look positively at the balcony because it would be easier to get out of the house, particularly since it would be off of the master bedroom where people sleep, Commissioner Pearce stated that the applicants have mitigated the privacy issues as well as they could be, Commissioner Blank noted that there are no view easements or documentation of any entitlements and added that there would be more sensitivity to privacy issues if there were a view easement because there would be an expectation of privacy. Chairperson Arkin stated that the Commission is generally more concerned with the view in cases where there is actually a view of the ridge. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: RECUSED: ABSENT: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Olson, and Pearson. Commissioner Fox, None, None, None, Resolution No, PC-2006-39 was entered and adopted as motioned, Chairperson Arkin informed the appellants that they had 15 days to appeal the decision to the City Conncil. DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 26, 2006 Page 4 of 4