Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. Per County records and as stated on Page AI, the existing home is 1,680 square feet. <br />The total addition is 1,344 square feet, for a total proposed square footage of3,024. <br />Staff is unclear on how the appellant arrived at his calculations. However, as stated in <br />the staff report, staff reiterates that: The applicant and the property owner mllst also <br />sign the Applicationfor Development Review that requires them, "To certifY that the <br />information and exhibits submitted are true and correct." <br /> <br />{?oel tV'" f' 6- '" <br /> <br />F.. "".;1( /1,' CA j..? ~ S' <> <br /> <br />ff? 4/C N. F ~ ;<} , R J <br /> <br />sCt <br />-'- <br />~ <br /> <br />;:"1") <br />'1'0 '?'U <br />,/ <br /> <br />3, <br /> <br />.., F T()7At.. <br />- <br /> <br />fJt. E/?:;$" <br /> <br />~#PI.V <br /> <br />r- <br />!'-"o? <br /> <br />T /1 ,;;: <br /> <br />;'-'1;9 r/r. <br /> <br />3, Please see above, Staff does not concur that the total floor area is 3,850. <br /> <br />'1', <br /> <br />_.~.? <br /> <br />YDA/.;'- <br />,Jv,--y :::J.(;,:2&,""~/P;96't:.- 'f .-nS <br /> <br />_" C' "''''4,-u/,1 FE-AAlT) (s!Je..../:.?s <br />sT~'1T(.;:.r ;l.-", <r,T <br />-,,o@/i"G'S')Sfl()WLt7 vi3' P..A"",T'C-I7~ <br />"It _ VPt- t;:-r; <br />- {'I A M 55 A;-J Y 1-'-_ <br />...v1-iI"l1" ot1'9~5 TI-t.:- <br /> <br />Cl t'C j? t.. /9 /,1 T S C <br /> <br />0/11 <br /> <br />'!""; ~'... ,.... <br />;~ 'L \,; <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />"'<, <br /> <br />4, Staff believes the appellant is referring to the staff report. As stated in the report, the <br />ZA approved the project with conditions of approval requiring the applicant to plant <br />two trees along their rear property line, and 5-gallon bushes along the Stantons rear <br />property line (at their consent) in order to provide visual screening. As typically <br />worded by the Planning Department, the conditions state that, "The type and species <br />of trees shall be subject to the review and approval of the City's landscape architect <br />[and/or] Planning Director, "These were conditions that were discussed and <br />consented to by the Rhoades and Mrs. Stanton at the June 22nd ZA hearing that Mr. <br />Stanton did not attend. <br /> <br />Memo in Response to Appellant <br />PAP-97/PADR-1542 7/25/06 <br />Page 2 00 <br />